Literature DB >> 17950628

Anterior acromioplasty for the shoulder impingement syndrome: long-term outcome.

Patrick Y K Chin1, John W Sperling, Robert H Cofield, Michael J Stuart, Brian S Crownhart.   

Abstract

This study reanalyzes a group of patients who had anterior acromioplasty between 1975 and 1979, whose results were reported in 1990 at a mean 8-year follow-up, to identify any continuing problems or new complications, to assess the frequency of further surgery, and to define long-term outcome. Thirty-two patients were included. The mean follow-up was 25 years (range, 21 to 27 years). All had the impingement syndrome. At surgery, there was tendon and bursal inflammation with fibrosis in 28 shoulders and a small rotator cuff tear in 4. Five shoulders have required additional surgery: distal clavicle excision in one, revision anterior acromioplasty in one, and repair of a new rotator cuff tear in three. Of the shoulders, 23 (72%) were reported as having no or slight pain. Positive patient satisfaction was expressed in 28 (88%). Comparisons were made to the opposite shoulder in this older patient group. The mean within-patient difference between the operative shoulder and the opposite shoulder on the Simple Shoulder Test was 0.4, with scores of 8.9 for the operative side and 9.3 for the opposite side (P = .47). The mean difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's score was 8.6 points, with scores of 75 for the operative side and 83 for the opposite side (P = .02). The results of open acromioplasty for the impingement syndrome are usually maintained over time. Acromioplasty does not always prevent the need for subsequent rotator cuff surgery, but the rate of reoperation has remained relatively low in the long follow-up period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17950628     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  7 in total

Review 1.  Surgical options for patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Salma Chaudhury; Stephen E Gwilym; Jane Moser; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Advances in arthroscopy-indications and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Andrew J Carr; Andrew J Price; Sion Glyn-Jones; Jonathan L Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Subacromial shoulder pain.

Authors:  Rohit Kulkarni; Joanna Gibson; Peter Brownson; Michael Thomas; Amar Rangan; Andrew J Carr; Jonathan L Rees
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2015-03-31

4.  Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Keun Man Shin
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2011-06-03

5.  The influence of age, delay of repair, and tendon involvement in acute rotator cuff tears: structural and clinical outcomes after repair of 42 shoulders.

Authors:  Hanna C Björnsson; Rolf Norlin; Kajsa Johansson; Lars E Adolfsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  The CSAW Study (Can Shoulder Arthroscopy Work?) - a placebo-controlled surgical intervention trial assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic subacromial decompression for shoulder pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David Beard; Jonathan Rees; Ines Rombach; Cushla Cooper; Jonathan Cook; Naomi Merritt; Alastair Gray; Stephen Gwilym; Andrew Judge; Julian Savulescu; Jane Moser; Jenny Donovan; Marcus Jepson; Caroline Wilson; Irene Tracey; Karolina Wartolowska; Benjamin Dean; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Shoulder Impingement.

Authors:  Bijayendra Singh; Nik Bakti; Abhinav Gulihar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.