Literature DB >> 17950505

Differences in pedal forces during recumbent cycling in adolescents with and without cerebral palsy.

Therese E Johnston1, Laura A Prosser, Samuel C K Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We showed that subjects with cerebral palsy had greater transverse and frontal plane hip and knee motion, increased duration of muscle activity, increased cocontraction, and decreased efficiency during recumbent cycling than subjects with typical development. However, it is also important to understand the forces exerted on the pedals. The purpose of this report was to compare pedal forces during cycling between adolescents with and without cerebral palsy.
METHODS: Ten subjects (3 male, 7 female) with spastic diplegic or quadriplegic cerebral palsy (15.6 years, SD 1.8) and 10 subjects (3 male, 7 female) with typical development (14.9 years, SD 1.4) cycled on a stationary recumbent cycle at 30 and 60 revolutions per minute if able. Three-dimensional piezoelectric force transducers measured pedal forces. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVAs.
FINDINGS: Subjects with cerebral palsy spent a smaller percentage (P<.001, r2=.09, power=1.0) of the revolution applying positive force (pushing into the pedal during the extension phase) and a greater percentage (P<.001, r2=.09, power=1.0) of the revolution applying negative force (pulling away from the pedal during the flexion phase). There was no effect of cadence and no interaction effect.
INTERPRETATION: These findings compliment our earlier findings of altered joint kinematics and muscle activity indicating that subjects with cerebral palsy and typical development have different cycling strategies. Methods to increase the duration of the positive force may allow subjects with CP to cycle more successfully and cycle vigorously enough to reach a heart rate necessary for improving fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17950505      PMCID: PMC3040514          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  8 in total

1.  Testing peak cycling performance: effects of braking force during growth.

Authors:  E Doré; M Bedu; N M França; O Diallo; P Duché; E Van Praagh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Knee kinetics during functional electrical stimulation induced cycling in subjects with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J C Franco; K L Perell; R J Gregor; A M Scremin
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1999-07

3.  Kinematic analyses of semireclined leg cycling in able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals.

Authors:  R D Trumbower; P D Faghri
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Biomechanics of submaximal recumbent cycling in adolescents with and without cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Therese E Johnston; Ann E Barr; Samuel Ck Lee
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-04-03

5.  Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  R Palisano; P Rosenbaum; S Walter; D Russell; E Wood; B Galuppi
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.449

6.  Efficiency of pedal forces during ergometer cycling.

Authors:  M O Ericson; R Nisell
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  Cycling patterns in children with and without cerebral palsy.

Authors:  S L Kaplan
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 8.  Dorsal rhizotomy for children with cerebral palsy: support for concepts of motor control.

Authors:  C A Giuliani
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1991-03
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Supine cycling in pediatric exercise testing: disparity in performance measures.

Authors:  Lindsay J May; Rajesh Punn; Inger Olson; Jeffrey A Kazmucha; Michael Y Liu; Clifford Chin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Evaluation of functional electrical stimulation to assist cycling in four adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Ann Tokay Harrington; Calum G A McRae; Samuel C K Lee
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-05-22

3.  Modular mechatronic system for stationary bicycles interfaced with virtual environment for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Richard G Ranky; Mark L Sivak; Jeffrey A Lewis; Venkata K Gade; Judith E Deutsch; Constantinos Mavroidis
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Effects of a training programme of functional electrical stimulation (FES) powered cycling, recreational cycling and goal-directed exercise training on children with cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Ellen L Armstrong; Roslyn N Boyd; Megan J Kentish; Christopher P Carty; Sean A Horan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Toward a hybrid exoskeleton for crouch gait in children with cerebral palsy: neuromuscular electrical stimulation for improved knee extension.

Authors:  Blynn L Shideler; Thomas C Bulea; Ji Chen; Christopher J Stanley; Andrew J Gravunder; Diane L Damiano
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Positive Pacing Strategies Are Utilized by Elite Male and Female Para-cyclists in Short Time Trials in the Velodrome.

Authors:  Rachel L Wright
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.