Literature DB >> 17949982

The genetic basis of individual-recognition signals in the mouse.

Sarah A Cheetham1, Michael D Thom, Francine Jury, William E R Ollier, Robert J Beynon, Jane L Hurst.   

Abstract

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is widely assumed to be a primary determinant of individual-recognition scents in many vertebrates [1-6], but there has been no functional test of this in animals with normal levels of genetic variation. Mice have evolved another polygenic and highly polymorphic set of proteins for scent communication, the major urinary proteins (MUPs) [7-12], which may provide a more reliable identity signature ([13, 14] and A.L. Sherborne, M.D.T., S. Paterson, F.J., W.E.R.O., P. Stockley, R.J.B., and J.L.H., unpublished data). We used female preference for males that countermark competitor male scents [15-17] to test the ability of wild-derived mice to recognize individual males differing in MHC or MUP type on a variable genetic background. Differences in MHC type were not used for individual recognition. Instead, recognition depended on a difference in MUP type, regardless of other genetic differences between individuals. Recognition also required scent contact, consistent with detection of involatile components through the vomeronasal system [6, 18]. Other differences in individual scent stimulated investigation but did not result in individual recognition. Contrary to untested assumptions of a vertebrate-wide mechanism based largely on MHC variation, mice use a species-specific [12] individual identity signature that can be recognized reliably despite the complex internal and external factors that influence scents [2]. Specific signals for genetic identity recognition in other species now need to be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17949982     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  73 in total

1.  The recognition signal hypothesis for the adaptive evolution of religion : a phylogenetic test with Christian denominations.

Authors:  Luke J Matthews
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

2.  High resolution X-ray structures of mouse major urinary protein nasal isoform in complex with pheromones.

Authors:  Samantha Perez-Miller; Qin Zou; Milos V Novotny; Thomas D Hurley
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  The joy of sex pheromones.

Authors:  Carolina Gomez-Diaz; Richard Benton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Studies of an Androgen-Binding Protein Knockout Corroborate a Role for Salivary ABP in Mouse Communication.

Authors:  Amanda G Chung; Phillip M Belone; Barbora Vošlajerová Bímová; Robert C Karn; Christina M Laukaitis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  In search of the chemical basis for MHC odourtypes.

Authors:  Jae Kwak; Alan Willse; George Preti; Kunio Yamazaki; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mouse models of autism: testing hypotheses about molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Florence I Roullet; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011

7.  Semiochemical compounds of preen secretion reflect genetic make-up in a seabird species.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Thomas Merkling; Christine Raynaud; Hervé Mulard; Jean-Marie Bessière; Emeline Lhuillier; Scott A Hatch; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Major histocompatibility complex variation and evolution at a single, expressed DQA locus in two genera of elephants.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Archie; Tammy Henry; Jesus E Maldonado; Cynthia J Moss; Joyce H Poole; Virginia R Pearson; Suzan Murray; Susan C Alberts; Robert C Fleischer
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.846

9.  The mechanism of expansion and the volatility it created in three pheromone gene clusters in the mouse (Mus musculus) genome.

Authors:  Robert C Karn; Christina M Laukaitis
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Mammalian olfactory receptors.

Authors:  Joerg Fleischer; Heinz Breer; Joerg Strotmann
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.