BACKGROUND: We evaluated the magnitude of the reported associations between amygdala activation and the serotonin transporter gene linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) and the likely effect size of this relationship. METHODS: We used meta-analytic techniques to combine data from existing published and unpublished studies. We also tested for possible publication bias and explored possible moderating influences on any association, such as sample ancestry. RESULTS: Our results provide support for the association of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and amygdala activation and suggest that this locus may account for up to 10% of phenotypic variance. Although we did not observe evidence for potential publication bias in our main analysis, this was due in part to efforts to obtain unpublished data pertinent to this meta-analysis, and when three unpublished data sets were excluded we did observe evidence of such bias. We also observed evidence that the first published study may provide an overestimate of the true effect size, which is consistent with findings from genetic association studies of other phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Although our analysis provides support for the association of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and amygdala activation, it also suggests that most studies to date are nevertheless lacking in statistical power. Increasing the sample sizes of future imaging genetics studies will allow a more accurate characterization of any true effect size and afford adequate power to examine the impact of multiple polymorphisms that likely work in concert to affect gene function and, in turn, bias neural processes mediating dispositional traits such as temperament and personality.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the magnitude of the reported associations between amygdala activation and the serotonin transporter gene linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) and the likely effect size of this relationship. METHODS: We used meta-analytic techniques to combine data from existing published and unpublished studies. We also tested for possible publication bias and explored possible moderating influences on any association, such as sample ancestry. RESULTS: Our results provide support for the association of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and amygdala activation and suggest that this locus may account for up to 10% of phenotypic variance. Although we did not observe evidence for potential publication bias in our main analysis, this was due in part to efforts to obtain unpublished data pertinent to this meta-analysis, and when three unpublished data sets were excluded we did observe evidence of such bias. We also observed evidence that the first published study may provide an overestimate of the true effect size, which is consistent with findings from genetic association studies of other phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Although our analysis provides support for the association of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and amygdala activation, it also suggests that most studies to date are nevertheless lacking in statistical power. Increasing the sample sizes of future imaging genetics studies will allow a more accurate characterization of any true effect size and afford adequate power to examine the impact of multiple polymorphisms that likely work in concert to affect gene function and, in turn, bias neural processes mediating dispositional traits such as temperament and personality.
Authors: Joan Kaufman; Bao-Zhu Yang; Heather Douglas-Palumberi; Shadi Houshyar; Deborah Lipschitz; John H Krystal; Joel Gelernter Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-11-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tom Johnstone; Leah H Somerville; Andrew L Alexander; Terrence R Oakes; Richard J Davidson; Ned H Kalin; Paul J Whalen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ahmad R Hariri; Emily M Drabant; Karen E Munoz; Bhaskar S Kolachana; Venkata S Mattay; Michael F Egan; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-02
Authors: Frieder M Paulus; Sören Krach; Johannes Bedenbender; Martin Pyka; Jens Sommer; Axel Krug; Susanne Knake; Markus M Nöthen; Stephanie H Witt; Marcella Rietschel; Tilo Kircher; Andreas Jansen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Michele Gelfand; Garriy Shteynberg; Tiane Lee; Janetta Lun; Sarah Lyons; Chris Bell; Joan Y Chiao; C Bayan Bruss; May Al Dabbagh; Zeynep Aycan; Abdel-Hamid Abdel-Latif; Munqith Dagher; Hilal Khashan; Nazar Soomro Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Aoife O'Donovan; A Janet Tomiyama; Jue Lin; Eli Puterman; Nancy E Adler; Margaret Kemeny; Owen M Wolkowitz; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Elissa S Epel Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Marie J C Forgeard; Emily A P Haigh; Aaron T Beck; Richard J Davidson; Fritz A Henn; Steven F Maier; Helen S Mayberg; Martin E P Seligman Journal: Clin Psychol (New York) Date: 2011-12
Authors: Joan Y Chiao; Ahmad R Hariri; Tokiko Harada; Yoko Mano; Norihiro Sadato; Todd B Parrish; Tetsuya Iidaka Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.436