Literature DB >> 17949324

Spread of thermal energy and heat sinks: implications for nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy.

Farhan Khan1, Esequiel Rodriguez, David S Finley, Douglas W Skarecky, Thomas E Ahlering.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: During nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, nerve injury caused by thermal energy is a concern. Using a porcine model, we studied thermal spread and queried whether vessels such as the prostatic pedicle may act as a heat sink, reducing the spread of thermal energy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monopolar (MP) and bipolar (BP) cautery was applied laparoscopically on the anterior abdominal wall surface of six pigs with the da Vinci robot. Using fiberoptic thermometry (Luxtron Inc. Santa Clara, CA), temperatures were recorded with and without the interposed inferior epigastric vessels to evaluate the heat sink effect.
RESULTS: Interposition of the inferior epigastric vessels definitively demonstrated a heat sink phenomenon: at 7 mm from the MP/BP energy source, temperatures rose 10.7 degrees C to 13.8 degrees C without interposed vessels versus only 1.9 degrees C to 2.5 degrees C when vessels were interposed (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The heat sink phenomenon suggests that the prostatic vascular pedicle should be protective of the neurovascular bundle during transection of the bladder neck during laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17949324     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.9908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  Experimental study on biopsy sampling using new flexible cryoprobes: influence of activation time, probe size, tissue consistency, and contact pressure of the probe on the size of the biopsy specimen.

Authors:  Karl-Josef Franke; Mara Szyrach; Georg Nilius; Jürgen Hetzel; Martin Hetzel; Karl-Heinz Ruehle; Markus D Enderle
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  LigaSure versus the standard technique (Hem-o-lok clips) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Shuzo Hamamoto; Mostafa AbdelRazek; Taku Naiki; Kazumi Taguchi; Toshiki Etani; Shoichiro Iwatsuki; Ryosuke Ando; Atsushi Okada; Noriyasu Kawai; Takahiro Yasui
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-11

3.  Athermal tension adjustable suture ligation of the vascular pedicle during robot-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shawn M Beck; Douglas Skarecky; Scott Miller; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  The application of regional hypothermia using transrectal cooling during radical prostatectomy: mitigation of surgical inflammatory damage to preserve continence.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Douglas Skarecky; Blanca Morales; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Different Nerve-Sparing Techniques during Radical Prostatectomy and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Iason Kyriazis; Theodoros Spinos; Arman Tsaturyan; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Jens Uwe Stolzenburg; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm.

Authors:  Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-03

Review 7.  Advances in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy over Time.

Authors:  Emma F P Jacobs; Ronald Boris; Timothy A Masterson
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2013-11-12

8.  Thermal effects of monopolar electrosurgery detected by real-time infrared thermography: an experimental appendectomy study.

Authors:  Taras V Nechay; Svetlana M Titkova; Mikhail V Anurov; Elena V Mikhalchik; Kirill Y Melnikov-Makarchyk; Ekaterina A Ivanova; Alexander E Tyagunov; Abe Fingerhut; Alexander V Sazhin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.