Literature DB >> 17948729

Constrained active appearance models for segmentation of triplane echocardiograms.

Jøger Hansegård1, Stig Urheim, Ketil Lunde, Stein Inge Rabben.   

Abstract

This paper presents multiview and multiframe active appearance models (AAMs) for left ventricular segmentation in triplane echocardiograms. We describe a general way of integrating local edge detector based segmentation algorithms into the AAM framework. The feasibility of this approach is evaluated by comparing an AAM constrained by a dynamic programming (DP) based snake with an unconstrained AAM, and an AAM constrained by manually defined landmarks. A leave-one-out validation scheme was used for training and testing of the methods. Evaluation was done in 36 patients suffering from various heart diseases, using manually determined volumes and ejection fractions (EF) as reference. The segmentation was initialized by manual selection of the mitral annulus and apex in three imaging planes. The differences, in volume, between manual segmentation and the best automatic method (DP-constrained AAM) were -3.1 +/- 20 ml (mean +/-SD) at end-diastole and 0.61 +/- 13 ml at end-systole. The difference in EF was -1.3 +/- 6.3%, comparable to the interobserver variability. We show that 1) constraining the model to manually defined landmarks improves volume and EF estimates compared to unconstrained AAMs, 2) further improvement is achieved using a DP-constrained AAM, and 3) segmentation in triplane echocardiograms gives higher accuracy than single plane data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17948729     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2007.900692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  8 in total

1.  Automatic anatomy recognition via multiobject oriented active shape models.

Authors:  Xinjian Chen; Jayaram K Udupa; Abass Alavi; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  New developments in paediatric cardiac functional ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Chris L de Korte; Maartje M Nillesen; Anne E C M Saris; Richard G P Lopata; Johan M Thijssen; Livia Kapusta
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  An ultrasound-driven kinematic model for deformation of the infarcted mouse left ventricle incorporating a near-incompressibility constraint.

Authors:  Dan Lin; Brent A French; Yaqin Xu; John A Hossack; Jeffrey W Holmes
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  GC-ASM: Synergistic Integration of Graph-Cut and Active Shape Model Strategies for Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Xinjian Chen; Jayaram K Udupa; Abass Alavi; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Harnessing Machine Intelligence in Automatic Echocardiogram Analysis: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ghada Zamzmi; Li-Yueh Hsu; Wen Li; Vandana Sachdev; Sameer Antani
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-22

6.  Body-wide hierarchical fuzzy modeling, recognition, and delineation of anatomy in medical images.

Authors:  Jayaram K Udupa; Dewey Odhner; Liming Zhao; Yubing Tong; Monica M S Matsumoto; Krzysztof C Ciesielski; Alexandre X Falcao; Pavithra Vaideeswaran; Victoria Ciesielski; Babak Saboury; Syedmehrdad Mohammadianrasanani; Sanghun Sin; Raanan Arens; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Semi-automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Jøger Hansegård; Stig Urheim; Ketil Lunde; Siri Malm; Stein Inge Rabben
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.062

8.  A Combined Fully Convolutional Networks and Deformable Model for Automatic Left Ventricle Segmentation Based on 3D Echocardiography.

Authors:  Suyu Dong; Gongning Luo; Kuanquan Wang; Shaodong Cao; Qince Li; Henggui Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.