Literature DB >> 17948023

Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery.

Mary F Dillon1, Aoife A Maguire, Enda W McDermott, Clara Myers, Arnold D K Hill, Ann O'Doherty, Cecily M Quinn.   

Abstract

Selection of patients for breast-conserving surgery relies on inexact parameters such as the preoperative estimation of lesion size. This study investigates the value of needle core biopsy findings, in particular, the relative quantity of DCIS, in improving patient selection for breast conservation. Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for invasive ductal carcinoma from 1999 to 2004 were identified. Only patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma (DCIS and invasive) on core biopsy were included. All core biopsies were reviewed by a breast histopathologist to document the quantity and characteristics of the DCIS component. Of a total of 281 patients, 46% (n=129) had invasive disease on core biopsy (group 1) and 54% (n=152) had either invasive disease with an accompanying DCIS component or DCIS only on core biopsy (group 2). The compromised margin rate for group 1 was 23% compared to 39% for group 2 (P=0.004). The rate of compromised margins increased progressively as the core biopsy DCIS component increased until a rate of 75% (n=18/24) was reached in patients with DCIS only on core biopsy. In patients with a DCIS component on core biopsy, the presence of necrosis (P=0.002), solid type architecture (P=0.008), high grade DCIS (P=0.007), calcification (P=0.003), and the relative proportion of DCIS present (P<0.001) were associated with compromised margins on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis of this subgroup, the proportion of DCIS in this subgroup (P=0.048) was an independent predictor of compromised margins. The presence and relative proportion of DCIS on core biopsy provides important information as to whether patients are at risk of compromised margins. Documentation of these parameters may assist patient selection for breast-conserving surgery or identify patients who may benefit from wider margins at the time of initial operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17948023     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  8 in total

1.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2014.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Marc Thill; Volker Hanf; Florian Schütz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Compromised margins following mastectomy for stage I-III invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Yu; Fatema Al Mushawah; Marie E Taylor; Amy E Cyr; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft; Timothy J Eberlein; Feng Gao; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Positive margin rates following breast-conserving surgery for stage I-III breast cancer: palpable versus nonpalpable tumors.

Authors:  Jordan Atkins; Fatema Al Mushawah; Catherine M Appleton; Amy E Cyr; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft; Timothy J Eberlein; Feng Gao; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Margin index: a useful tool for the breast surgeon?

Authors:  Claire Edwards; Feng Gao; Gary M Freedman; Julie A Margenthaler; Carla Fisher
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Predicting initial margin status in breast cancer patients during breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Zihao Pan; Liling Zhu; Qian Li; Jianguo Lai; Jingwen Peng; Fengxi Su; Shunrong Li; Kai Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  High and intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast: a comparison of pathologic features in core biopsies and excisions and an evaluation of core biopsy features that may predict a close or positive margin in the excision.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Nathan F Clement; Mohiedean Ghofrani
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Structured Illumination Microscopy and a Quantitative Image Analysis for the Detection of Positive Margins in a Pre-Clinical Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Sarcoma.

Authors:  Henry L Fu; Jenna L Mueller; Melodi J Whitley; Diana M Cardona; Rebecca M Willett; David G Kirsch; J Quincy Brown; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.