Literature DB >> 17947267

Prevalence of eye signs in congenital rubella syndrome in South India: a role for population screening.

P Vijayalakshmi1, T Amala Rajasundari, Noela Marie Prasad, S Karthik Prakash, Kalpana Narendran, Meenakshi Ravindran, V R Muthukkaruppan, Prajna Lalitha, David W G Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) resulting from maternal rubella infection, especially in the first trimester, affects an estimated 100 000 infants each year worldwide. Immunisation has reduced its occurrence in the developed world, though it remains a problem in countries with poor immunisation coverage. This population-based study was aimed at screening children below 5 years of age for ocular signs suspicious of CRS.
METHODS: Suspected CRS cases were recruited from hospital and outreach services of the Aravind Eye Care System over a 24-month period. Clinical confirmation was based on the fulfilment of the World Health Organization (WHO) definition, and laboratory confirmation was based on a positive test for IgM antibody.
RESULTS: Children under 5 years of age (n = 51 548) with ocular complaints were screened for eye signs suspicious of CRS; CRS compatible signs were detected in 1.92% (1090) children. Of these suspects (299), 27.42% were subsequently confirmed clinically according to WHO definition, and (46) 4.2% were serologically (Laboratory) confirmed. Of all the eye signs evaluated for screening, cataracts were the most sensitive (80.43%).
CONCLUSIONS: Cataracts among children have a high sensitivity for detecting CRS in India. It is the only clinical eye finding that has a high enough sensitivity and specificity to be useful as a screening tool for CRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17947267      PMCID: PMC2095451          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.114629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  10 in total

1.  Prevalence of rubella virus in suspected cases of congenital infections.

Authors:  M Ballal; P G Shivananda
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Rubella-specific IgM antibody as an aid to the diagnosis of acquired and congenital rubella.

Authors:  J D Gupta; A M Murphy
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Performance of rubella suspect case definition: implications for surveillance.

Authors:  Solange Artimos de Oliveira; Luiz Antonio Bastos Camacho; Antonio Carlos de Medeiros Pereira; Marília Mattos Bulhões; Angélica Fortes Aguas; Marilda Mendonça Siqueira
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  Immune response in rubella infection.

Authors:  T Vesikari
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1972

5.  The association of rubella virus in congenital cataract - a hospital-based study in India.

Authors:  J Malathi; K L Therese; H N Madhavan
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Ocular manifestations of congenital rubella syndrome in a developing country.

Authors:  P Vijayalakshmi; Gaurav Kakkar; Arun Samprathi; R Banushree
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Epidemiology based etiological study of pediatric cataract in western India.

Authors:  S R Kaid Johar; N K Savalia; A R Vasavada; P D Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Med Sci       Date:  2004-03

Review 8.  Rubella and congenital rubella syndrome: global update.

Authors:  Susan E Robertson; David A Featherstone; Marta Gacic-Dobo; Bradley S Hersh
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2003-11

9.  The seroepidemiology of Rubella in Amritsar (Punjab).

Authors:  N Singla; N Jindal; A Aggarwal
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.985

10.  Aetiology of childhood cataract in south India.

Authors:  M Eckstein; P Vijayalakshmi; M Killedar; C Gilbert; A Foster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.638

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Congenital rubella syndrome: the end is in sight.

Authors:  Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  An infant with congenital rubella syndrome in developing India.

Authors:  Ajit Singh; Sharon Narula; Hashir Kareem; Tom Devasia
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-28

3.  Global challenges in the management of congenital cataract: proceedings of the 4th International Congenital Cataract Symposium held on March 7, 2014, New York, New York.

Authors:  Phoebe D Lenhart; Paul Courtright; M Edward Wilson; Susan Lewallen; David Samuel Taylor; Marcelo C Ventura; Richard Bowman; Lee Woodward; Lauren C Ditta; Stacey Kruger; Danny Haddad; Nihal El Shakankiri; Salma Kc Rai; Tehara Bailey; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Lacrimal drainage anomalies in congenital rubella syndrome.

Authors:  Shweta Gupta; Mohammad Javed Ali; Milind N Naik
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-09

5.  Is 20/20 visual outcome a reality in rubella cataract? - Prognostic factors in children with cataract associated with congenital rubella syndrome.

Authors:  Deepti Joshi; R Krishnaprasad; Apeksha Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  MR/MMR Vaccine in Measles Control: A Case of Missed Opportunity?

Authors:  Karun D Sharma; Manish K Rana
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2014-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.