Literature DB >> 17944340

Randomized controlled clinical pilot trial of titanium vs. glass fiber prefabricated posts: preliminary results after up to 3 years.

Michael Naumann1, Guido Sterzenbac, Franke Alexandra, Thomas Dietrich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized parallel-group clinical pilot study aimed to compare the clinical outcome of prefabricated rigid titanium to glass fiber endodontic posts when luted with self-adhesive universal resin cement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients in need of postendodontic restoration were assessed for eligibility. Ninety-one patients met the selection criteria and were randomized and allocated to 2 intervention groups. Forty-five participants were treated using a titanium post and 46 participants received a glass fiber post, each in combination with composite core buildups for postendodontic restoration. All posts had a diameter of 1.4 mm and a length of 13 mm and were cemented 8 mm within the root canal with self-adhesive universal resin cement. A circumferential ferrule of 2 mm was always provided. Surgical crown lengthening was necessary in 13 cases. Patients were observed in intervals of 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after post placement.
RESULTS: After 24 to 36 months (mean +/- SD: 27.9 +/- 5.6) of observation following post placement, 1 tooth was extracted because of changes of the prosthetic treatment plan. No failures were observed among the 88 patients with follow-up data.
CONCLUSIONS: Both titanium and glass fiber reinforced composite posts result in successful treatment outcomes after 2 years. The material combination used seems to be appropriate in the short term for cementing endodontic posts, irrespective of the post material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17944340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  5 in total

Review 1.  Survival Rates of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Restored with All-Ceramic Partial-Coverage Crowns: When Systematic Review Fails.

Authors:  Marco Ferrari; Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco; Denise Irene Karin Pontoriero; Carlo Ercoli; Kostantinos Chochlidakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts.

Authors:  Marjaneh Ghavamnasiri; Fatemeh Maleknejad; Hamideh Ameri; Mohammad Javad Moghaddas; Fatemeh Farzaneh; Joseph E Chasteen
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-10

Review 3.  An overview of clinical studies on fiber post systems.

Authors:  Idil Dikbas; Jale Tanalp
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-23

4.  The effect of ferrule presence and type of dowel on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with metal-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  Vivek Aggarwal; Mamta Singla; Suman Yadav; Harish Yadav; Vikram Sharma; Saranjit Singh Bhasin
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-03

5.  Dentists' perspectives on the reconstruction possibilities of a non-vital tooth.

Authors:  Andrea Chisnoiu; Alina Picos; Liana Lascu; Marius Negucioiu; Radu Chisnoiu; Andreea Kui
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-10-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.