Literature DB >> 1794428

Low vision aids--is our service cost effective?

G G McIlwaine1, J A Bell, G N Dutton.   

Abstract

A questionnaire and telephone survey was carried out on a Scottish population of patients with impaired vision, in order to ascertain the proportion of patients who gain benefit from Low Vision Aids (LVA) and to determine the number of LVAs which are retained but unused. One third of the patients who answered the questionnaire never use their LVAs, and one half were not satisfied with the service provided. A cost analysis indicated that approximately (pounds) 8,000 worth of LVAs are neither used nor returned each year to a single LVA service. The patients' ages, diagnoses, and visual acuities were related to the compliance rate. It appears that increasing age and decreasing visual acuity may be factors which decrease compliance. However none of the factors analysed could be used as a reliable predictor of patient satisfaction or of eventual benefit. Other health services which provide intensive training in the use of LVAs reportedly achieve a higher level of compliance. We conclude that our present service could probably be improved by the employment of additional staff specifically trained to teach patients how to make best use of the LVAs provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1794428     DOI: 10.1038/eye.1991.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

1.  Minimising the impact of visual impairment. From October this will have to be done to conform to the law.

Authors:  J M Carter; N Markham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-11

2.  Head mounted video magnification devices for low vision rehabilitation: a comparison with existing technology.

Authors:  R Harper; L Culham; C Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Low vision: a parochial view.

Authors:  C Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  The burden of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Mechelle L Jones; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Enhanced low vision rehabilitation for people with age related macular degeneration: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B C Reeves; R A Harper; W B Russell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  How effective is an integrated approach to low vision rehabilitation? Two year follow up results from south Devon.

Authors:  G N Shuttleworth; A Dunlop; J K Collins; C R James
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Comparison of clinician-predicted to measured low vision outcomes.

Authors:  Tiffany L Chan; Judith E Goldstein; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Portable electronic vision enhancement systems in comparison with optical magnifiers for near vision activities: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Nathan Bray; Andrew Brand; John Taylor; Zoe Hoare; Christine Dickinson; Rhiannon T Edwards
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.761

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.