OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that ventilation with 3 mL/kg tidal volume combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal by arteriovenous interventional lung assist reduces ventilator-associated organ injury in experimental acute lung injury when compared with ventilation with 6 mL/kg tidal volume without interventional lung assist. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: A university research laboratory. SUBJECTS: A total of 14 pigs weighing 46 +/- 4 kg (mean +/- sd). INTERVENTIONS: Acute lung injury was induced by repeated lung lavages until Pao2 was <100 mm Hg, with Fio2 of 1.0 and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, for 1 hr without additional lavages. Animals were randomized to an interventional group with a tidal volume of 3 mL/kg with interventional lung assist (n = 7) or to a control group with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg without interventional lung assist (n = 7) for 24 hrs. Organ function in vivo was determined by laboratory analyses, including calculations of pulmonary ventilation/perfusion distribution. Histologic assessment of organ injury was performed post mortem after 24 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In both groups, gas exchange improved in the course of the study (p < .05). However, in contrast to control animals, animals with lower tidal volumes and interventional lung assist had severe ventilation/perfusion mismatch, as indicated by increased perfusion to lung areas with a low ventilation/perfusion ratio (p < .05). Other variables of organ function in vivo and results of histologic examination post mortem did not reveal any statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combined ventilation with lower tidal volumes and extracorporeal CO2 removal as compared with traditional low tidal volumes without extracorporeal CO2 removal is not associated with differences in organ injury. Obviously, ventilation with tidal volumes of <6 mL/kg may cause pulmonary de-recruitment when positive end-expiratory pressure is not adequately increased. (C) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that ventilation with 3 mL/kg tidal volume combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal by arteriovenous interventional lung assist reduces ventilator-associated organ injury in experimental acute lung injury when compared with ventilation with 6 mL/kg tidal volume without interventional lung assist. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: A university research laboratory. SUBJECTS: A total of 14 pigs weighing 46 +/- 4 kg (mean +/- sd). INTERVENTIONS: Acute lung injury was induced by repeated lung lavages until Pao2 was <100 mm Hg, with Fio2 of 1.0 and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, for 1 hr without additional lavages. Animals were randomized to an interventional group with a tidal volume of 3 mL/kg with interventional lung assist (n = 7) or to a control group with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg without interventional lung assist (n = 7) for 24 hrs. Organ function in vivo was determined by laboratory analyses, including calculations of pulmonary ventilation/perfusion distribution. Histologic assessment of organ injury was performed post mortem after 24 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In both groups, gas exchange improved in the course of the study (p < .05). However, in contrast to control animals, animals with lower tidal volumes and interventional lung assist had severe ventilation/perfusion mismatch, as indicated by increased perfusion to lung areas with a low ventilation/perfusion ratio (p < .05). Other variables of organ function in vivo and results of histologic examination post mortem did not reveal any statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combined ventilation with lower tidal volumes and extracorporeal CO2 removal as compared with traditional low tidal volumes without extracorporeal CO2 removal is not associated with differences in organ injury. Obviously, ventilation with tidal volumes of <6 mL/kg may cause pulmonary de-recruitment when positive end-expiratory pressure is not adequately increased. (C) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Authors: Steffen Weber-Carstens; Sven Bercker; Matthias Hommel; Maria Deja; Martin MacGuill; Christiane Dreykluft; Udo Kaisers Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-01-31 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jonathan D Marhong; Laveena Munshi; Michael Detsky; Teagan Telesnicki; Eddy Fan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Thomas Bein; Steffen Weber-Carstens; Anton Goldmann; Thomas Müller; Thomas Staudinger; Jörg Brederlau; Ralf Muellenbach; Rolf Dembinski; Bernhard M Graf; Marlene Wewalka; Alois Philipp; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Matthias Lubnow; Arthur S Slutsky Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 17.440