Literature DB >> 17944022

Differential effects of vasopressin and norepinephrine on vascular reactivity in a long-term rodent model of sepsis.

Lucinda K Barrett1, Nelson N Orie, Valerie Taylor, Raymond P Stidwill, Lucie H Clapp, Mervyn Singer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is escalating interest in the therapeutic use of vasopressin in septic shock. However, little attention has focused on mechanisms underlying its pressor hypersensitivity, which contrasts with the vascular hyporesponsiveness to catecholamines. We investigated whether a long-term rodent model of sepsis would produce changes in endogenous levels and pressor reactivity to exogenous norepinephrine and vasopressin comparable with those seen in septic patients.
DESIGN: In vivo and ex vivo animal study.
SETTING: University research laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Male adult Wistar rats. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Fecal peritonitis was induced in conscious, fluid-resuscitated rats. Biochemical and hormonal profiles were measured at time points up to 48 hrs. Pressor responses to intravenous norepinephrine, vasopressin, and F-180, a selective V1 receptor agonist, were measured at 24 hrs. Contractile responses to these drugs were assessed in mesenteric arteries taken from animals at 24 hrs using wire myography. Comparisons were made against sham operation controls. MAIN
RESULTS: Septic rats became unwell and hypotensive, with a mortality of 64% at 48 hrs (0% in controls). Plasma norepinephrine levels were elevated in septic animals at 24 hrs (1968 +/- 490 vs. 492 +/- 90 pg/mL in controls, p = .003), whereas vasopressin levels were similar in the two groups (4.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.5 pg/mL, p = not significant). In vivo, the pressor response to norepinephrine was markedly reduced in the septic animals, but responses to vasopressin and F-180 were relatively preserved. In arteries from septic animals, norepinephrine contractions were decreased (efficacy as measured by maximum contractile response, Emax: 3.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.2 mN, p < .001). In contrast, the potency of vasopressin (expressed as the negative log of the concentration required to produce 50% of the maximum tension, pD2: 9.1 +/- 0.04 vs. 8.7 +/- 0.05, p < .001) and F-180 (pD2 8.2 +/- 0.04 vs. 7.6 +/- 0.02, p < .001) was enhanced (n > or = 6 for all groups).
CONCLUSIONS: This long-term animal model demonstrates changes in circulating vasoactive hormones similar to prolonged human sepsis, and decreased pressor sensitivity to norepinephrine. Ex vivo sensitivity to vasopressin agonists was heightened. This model is therefore appropriate for the further investigation of mechanisms underlying vasopressin hypersensitivity, which may include receptor or calcium-handling alterations within the vasculature. (C) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17944022     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000281861.72907.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  9 in total

1.  Cardiovascular Responsiveness to Vasopressin and α1-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists After Burn Injury.

Authors:  Ann E Evans; P Geoff Vana; Heather M LaPorte; Richard H Kennedy; Richard L Gamelli; Matthias Majetschak
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.845

2.  Continuous terlipressin versus vasopressin infusion in septic shock (TERLIVAP): a randomized, controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian Rehberg; Matthias Lange; Alessandra Orecchioni; Valeria Cecchini; Alessandra Bachetoni; Mariadomenica D'Alessandro; Hugo Van Aken; Paolo Pietropaoli; Martin Westphal
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Previous burn injury predisposes mice to lipopolysaccharide-induced changes in glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Edward A Carter; Kasie W Paul; Sandra A Barrow; Alan J Fischman; Ronald G Tompkins
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 4.  Association of Vasopressin Plus Catecholamine Vasopressors vs Catecholamines Alone With Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Distributive Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  William F McIntyre; Kevin J Um; Waleed Alhazzani; Alexandra P Lengyel; Ludhmila Hajjar; Anthony C Gordon; François Lamontagne; Jeff S Healey; Richard P Whitlock; Emilie P Belley-Côté
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Bench-to-bedside review: Vasopressin in the management of septic shock.

Authors:  James A Russell
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Combined use of high doses of vasopressin and corticosteroids in a patient with Crohn's disease with refractory septic shock after intestinal perforation: a case report.

Authors:  Salvatore Notaro; Marcello Sorrentino; Aniello Ruocco; Annalisa Notaro; Antonio Corcione; Patrizia Murino; Eugenio Piscitelli; Marianna Tamborino
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-13

7.  Effects of epinephrine on heart rate variability and cytokines in a rat sepsis model.

Authors:  Yun-Te Chang; Wei-Chun Huang; Chin-Chang Cheng; Meng-Wei Ke; Jung-Shun Tsai; Yao-Min Hung; Neng-Chyan Huang; Mu-Shun Huang; Shue-Ren Wann
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 8.  Recently published papers: predictors, pressors and poietins.

Authors:  Suzannah Ward; Richard Venn
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Translational evidence for two distinct patterns of neuroaxonal injury in sepsis: a longitudinal, prospective translational study.

Authors:  Johannes Ehler; Lucinda K Barrett; Valerie Taylor; Michael Groves; Francesco Scaravilli; Matthias Wittstock; Stephan Kolbaske; Annette Grossmann; Jörg Henschel; Martin Gloger; Tarek Sharshar; Fabrice Chretien; Francoise Gray; Gabriele Nöldge-Schomburg; Mervyn Singer; Martin Sauer; Axel Petzold
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.