Literature DB >> 17943845

Insoles for prevention and treatment of back pain.

T Sahar1, M J Cohen, V Ne'eman, L Kandel, D O Odebiyi, I Lev, M Brezis, A Lahad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is lack of theoretical and clinical knowledge of the use of insoles for prevention or treatment of back pain. The high incidence of back pain and the popularity of shoe insoles call for a systematic review of this practice.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of shoe insoles in the prevention and treatment of non-specific back pain compared to placebo, no intervention, or other interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following databases: The Cochrane Back Group Trials Register and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to March 2005, and MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL to February 2007; reviewed reference lists in review articles, guidelines and in the included trials; conducted citation tracking; contacted individuals with expertise in this domain. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials that examined the use of customized or non-customized insoles, for the prevention or treatment of back pain, compared to placebo, no intervention or other interventions. Study outcomes had to include at least one of the following: self-reported incidence or physician diagnosis of back pain; pain intensity; duration of back pain; absenteeism; functional status. Studies of insoles designed to treat limb length inequality were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author conducted the searches and blinded the retrieved references for authors, institution and journal. Two review authors independently selected the relevant articles. Two different review authors independently assessed the methodological quality and clinical relevance and extracted the data from each trial using a standardized form. MAIN
RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria: Three examined prevention of back pain (2061 participants) and three examined mixed populations (256 participants) without being clear whether they were aimed at primary or secondary prevention or treatment. No treatment trials were found. There is strong evidence that the use of insoles does not prevent back pain. There is limited evidence that insoles alleviate back pain or adversely shift the pain to the lower extremities. LIMITATIONS: This review largely reflects limitations of the literature, including low quality studies with heterogeneous interventions and outcome measures, poor blinding and poor reporting. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence that insoles are not effective for the prevention of back pain. The current evidence on insoles as treatment for low-back pain does not allow any conclusions.High quality trials are required for stronger conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17943845     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005275.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  9 in total

1.  What Does the Cochrane Collaboration Say about the Treatment of Pain?

Authors: 
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Orthotic insoles do not prevent physical stress-induced low back pain.

Authors:  Ville M Mattila; Petri Sillanpää; Tuula Salo; Heikki-Jussi Laine; Heikki Mäenpää; Harri Pihlajamäki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Informing your practice with reviews published by the cochrane back review group: conservative interventions for neck and back pain.

Authors:  Victoria Pennick; Irina Schelkanova; Andrea Furlan
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Comparison of Two Types of Insoles on Musculoskeletal Symptoms and Plantar Pressure Distribution in a Work Environment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Josiane S Almeida; Franciele M Vanderlei; Eliane C Pastre; Rodrigo A D M Martins; Carlos R Padovani; Guaracy C Filho
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-05-26

5.  Combined Chiropractic and Podiatric Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain Concomitant With a Unilateral Pronated Foot: Protocol for a Multicenter Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carlos Gevers-Montoro; Kelvin J Murray; Beatriz Santamaría; Gema Dominguez-Vera; Luis Álvarez-Galovich; Dein Vindigni; Michael F Azari; Arantxa Ortega de Mues; Aurora Castro-Mendez
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-04-06

6.  Triggers for an episode of sudden onset low back pain: study protocol.

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Jane Latimer; Bart W Koes; Fiona M Blyth; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

Authors:  Aoife Healy; Sybil Farmer; Anand Pandyan; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Organizational Justice and Health: A Survey in Hospital Workers.

Authors:  Nicola Magnavita; Carlo Chiorri; Daniela Acquadro Maran; Sergio Garbarino; Reparata Rosa Di Prinzio; Martina Gasbarri; Carmela Matera; Anna Cerrina; Maddalena Gabriele; Marcella Labella
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Pain education to prevent chronic low back pain: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Adrian C Traeger; G Lorimer Moseley; Markus Hübscher; Hopin Lee; Ian W Skinner; Michael K Nicholas; Nicholas Henschke; Kathryn M Refshauge; Fiona M Blyth; Chris J Main; Julia M Hush; Garry Pearce; James H McAuley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.