Literature DB >> 17942795

Why using current medications to select a medicare Part D plan may lead to higher out-of-pocket payments.

Marisa Elena Domino1, Sally C Stearns, Edward C Norton, Wei-Shi Yeh.   

Abstract

While medications are one of the most stable categories of health care expenses, the actual composition of drug products used may be highly variable over time. Medicare beneficiaries selecting among Part D prescription drug plans (PDPs) are often advised to base plan selection on current medication lists. However, this approach may lead to higher out-of-pocket payments relative to payments under other plans if drug switches are common. This article uses a sample of Medicare beneficiaries from the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to estimate how changes in actual drug use during a 1-year period affect estimated annual costs, given the initial choice of the lowest-cost PDP. While 57% of the sample had no difference in expenditure for plans selected based on initial versus end-of-the-year drug lists, 43% experienced average increases of $556 in annualized expenses due to drug switches. Implementable suggestions for improving the selection of Part D plans are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942795     DOI: 10.1177/1077558707307577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  8 in total

1.  How much choice is too much? The case of the Medicare prescription drug benefit.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Thomas Rice; Janet Cummings; Stacey Wood
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; David E Kanouse; Steven C Martino; Dale Shaller; Lise Rybowski
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Association of Medicare Part D medication out-of-pocket costs with utilization of statin medications.

Authors:  Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Tami Swenson; Jean M Abraham; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Sensitivity of medication use to formulary controls in medicare beneficiaries: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rahul Shenolikar; Amanda Schofield Bruno; Michael Eaddy; Christopher Cantrell
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2011-11

5.  The economics of choice: lessons from the U.S. health-care market.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Thomas Rice
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  More Is Not Always Better: Intuitions About Effective Public Policy Can Lead to Unintended Consequences.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; William Klein; Annette Kaufman; Louise Meilleur; Anna Dixon
Journal:  Soc Issues Policy Rev       Date:  2013-01-01

7.  Comparison friction: experimental evidence from medicare drug plans.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Kling; Sendhil Mullainathan; Eldar Shafir; Lee C Vermeulen; Marian V Wrobel
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2012

8.  Plan selection in Medicare Part D: evidence from administrative data.

Authors:  Florian Heiss; Adam Leive; Daniel McFadden; Joachim Winter
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.883

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.