Literature DB >> 17942776

New Jersey's experience: mandatory estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting.

Dennis P McDonough1.   

Abstract

The passage of legislation in New Jersey mandating the calculation and reporting by clinical laboratories of the estimated glomerular filtration rate whenever a serum creatinine test is performed resulted in a flurry of activity by laboratories to bring their facilities into compliance. After guidance provided by the Department of Health and Senior Services in November 2005 regarding legislative intent, New Jersey's clinical laboratories, including more than 80 acute care hospital laboratories, successfully implemented estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting by July 2006. This reporting, however, was not achieved without controversy and logistical barriers. Despite these issues, the initial feedback from physicians in response to receiving estimated glomerular filtration rate values on test reports as mandated by state law has been largely favorable. With more than 3.5 million estimated glomerular filtration rate values reported to the department by a sampling of large independent (n = 3), physician office (n = 4), and hospital (n = 11) laboratories, average estimated glomerular filtration rate values were as follows: 79% of physician office and independent laboratory estimated glomerular filtration rate values were > or = 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 2% were < 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2; by comparison, 66 and 11% of hospital values were > or = 60 and < 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Additional studies are necessary to determine whether the intent of the legislation to "aid health professionals in the early diagnosis of kidney disease," thereby resulting in improved treatment outcomes, is achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942776     DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01570407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  4 in total

1.  The costs and benefits of automatic estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting.

Authors:  Julia R den Hartog; Peter P Reese; Borut Cizman; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Evaluating the Impact and Rationale of Race-Specific Estimations of Kidney Function: Estimations from U.S. NHANES, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Jennifer W Tsai; Jessica P Cerdeña; William C Goedel; William S Asch; Vanessa Grubbs; Mallika L Mendu; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-11-19

3.  Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a qualitative study.

Authors:  David H Smith; Jennifer Schneider; Micah L Thorp; Suma Vupputuri; Jessica W Weiss; Eric S Johnson; Adrianne Feldstein; Amanda F Petrik; Xuihai Yang; Susan R Snyder
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Sex differences in chronic kidney disease awareness among US adults, 1999 to 2018.

Authors:  Sebastian Hödlmoser; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Jarcy Zee; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Ronald L Pisoni; Friedrich K Port; Bruce M Robinson; Robin Ristl; Simon Krenn; Amelie Kurnikowski; Michał Lewandowski; Allison Ton; Juan Jesus Carrero; Eva S Schernhammer; Manfred Hecking
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.