Literature DB >> 17942353

Aqueous drainage device surgery in refractory pediatric glaucomas: I. Long-term outcomes.

Erin O'Malley Schotthoefer1, Tammy L Yanovitch, Sharon F Freedman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term outcomes and complications of aqueous drainage device surgery in children with congenital and aphakic glaucoma.
METHODS: Chart review of consecutive children treated with aqueous drainage device surgery at Duke University Eye Center from 1995 to 2006, recording demographic, glaucoma-related, and anterior segment examination findings.
RESULTS: Included are 30 children (38 eyes) with congenital glaucoma and 32 children (41 eyes) with aphakic glaucoma. Median follow-up was 5.5 years (0.5-10.5) in the congenital glaucoma group and 3.5 years (0.5-13.8) in the aphakic glaucoma group. Pre-aqueous drainage device median intraocular pressure (IOP) was 29 mmHg in the congenital glaucoma group and 36 mmHg in the aphakic glaucoma group. Post-aqueous drainage device median IOP was 14 and 15 mmHg in the congenital and aphakic glaucoma group, respectively (p < 0.0001 vs pre-aqueous drainage device IOP). Post-aqueous drainage device pupil abnormalities were noted in 16% and 7% of eyes in the congenital glaucoma and aphakic glaucoma groups, respectively, and cataract occurred in 20% of phakic eyes in the congenital glaucoma group. Reoperation was necessary in 26% and 22% of eyes in the congenital glaucoma and aphakic glaucoma groups, respectively. One-year Kaplan-Meier success was 92% and 90% in the congenital and aphakic glaucoma groups, respectively, but fell by 10 years to 42% and 55%, respectively. Vision-threatening complications occurred in 10% of eyes overall. DISCUSSION: Aqueous drainage device surgery is moderately successful in children with refractory congenital and aphakic glaucoma. Common complications include corneal touch and cataract; iris abnormalities occur less commonly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942353     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  24 in total

1.  [Glaucoma and corneal transplantation].

Authors:  G Geerling; M Müller; M Zierhut; T Klink
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Glaucoma surgery in children].

Authors:  T S Dietlein
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Glaucoma surgery in childhood].

Authors:  T Klink; F Grehn
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Childhood glaucoma surgery in the 21st century.

Authors:  M Papadopoulos; B Edmunds; C Fenerty; P T Khaw
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Current status of epibulbar anti-glaucoma drainage devices in glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Hagen Thieme
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  [Glaucoma drainage devices].

Authors:  H Thieme
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Ahmed glaucoma valve in children: A review.

Authors:  Nariman Nassiri; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Anne L Coleman
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-30

8.  [Tube versus trabeculectomy study].

Authors:  H Thieme; L Choritz; C Schuart; T Wecke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Cyclophotocoagulation versus sequential tube shunt as a secondary intervention following primary tube shunt failure in pediatric glaucoma.

Authors:  Shalini Sood; Allen D Beck
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.220

10.  Long-term surgical outcomes of primary congenital glaucoma in China.

Authors:  Xiulan Zhang; Shaolin Du; Qian Fan; Shouxiong Peng; Minbin Yu; Jian Ge
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.