Literature DB >> 17942227

Across- and within-session variability of ratings of painful contact heat stimuli.

Raimi L Quiton1, Joel D Greenspan.   

Abstract

This study examined within- and across-session consistency of visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings of contact heat stimuli in 64 subjects (32 male). Subjects participated in four sessions over 14 days, with three stimulus series per session. Two levels of painful heat (pain-lo: rated 40, and pain-hi: rated 70 on a 0-100 VAS) were delivered in randomized order during each series, with temperatures selected on an individual subject basis to equalize pain perception across subjects. Across-session ratings declined by the fourth session for both pain levels (p=0.01). Within-session ratings declined by the third series for both pain levels (p<0.001). While significant, changes in across- and within-session ratings were of small magnitude. Comparison of coefficients of variation (CVs) for across- and within-session ratings revealed that pain-lo ratings were more variable than pain-hi ratings (p<0.001). Across- and within-session CVs were highly correlated for each pain level (pain-lo p<0.001; pain-hi p=0.001), suggesting that variability of VAS ratings is a characteristic of individual subjects over both short and long time scales. Across- and within-session CVs were significantly negatively correlated with individual ratings of the stimuli, but were not correlated with demographic or psychosocial factors. Furthermore, sex did not impact consistency of ratings, demonstrating that neither sex is more variable in ratings than the other over time. Taken together, these findings suggest that VAS ratings of painful contact heat are relatively stable over time but the variability of these ratings is significantly impacted by the perceived intensity of the stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942227      PMCID: PMC5105332          DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  19 in total

1.  Reduction of conditioned pain modulation in humans by naltrexone: an exploratory study of the effects of pain catastrophizing.

Authors:  Christopher D King; Burel Goodin; Lindsay L Kindler; Robert M Caudle; Robert R Edwards; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Joseph L Riley; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-04-26

Review 2.  Can quantitative sensory testing move us closer to mechanism-based pain management?

Authors:  Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Experimental pain phenotype profiles in a racially and ethnically diverse sample of healthy adults.

Authors:  Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Joseph L Riley; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Patient discomfort in bitewing examination with film and four digital receptors.

Authors:  P M Jørgensen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Differential associations between brain 5-HT(1A) receptor binding and response to pain versus touch.

Authors:  Ilkka K Martikainen; Jussi Hirvonen; Ullamari Pesonen; Nora Hagelberg; Heikki Laurikainen; Heikki Tuikkala; Jaana Kajander; Kjell Någren; Jarmo Hietala; Antti Pertovaara
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Relationship of intersession variation in negative pain-related affect and responses to thermally-evoked pain.

Authors:  Mark D Bishop; Jason G Craggs; Maggie E Horn; Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Variability in experimental pain studies: nuisance or opportunity?

Authors:  Victoria J Madden; Peter R Kamerman; Mark J Catley; Valeria Bellan; Leslie N Russek; Danny Camfferman; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Assessment of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury using quantitative pain drawings.

Authors:  Jan Rosner; Robin Lütolf; Pascal Hostettler; Michael Villiger; Ron Clijsen; Erich Hohenauer; Marco Barbero; Armin Curt; Michèle Hubli
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Brain mechanisms supporting violated expectations of pain.

Authors:  Fadel Zeidan; Oleg V Lobanov; Robert A Kraft; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.926

10.  A new tool for real-time pain assessment in experimental and clinical environments.

Authors:  Nils Schaffner; Gerd Folkers; Silvia Käppeli; Markus Musholt; Günther F L Hofbauer; Victor Candia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.