Literature DB >> 17942176

A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and associated risk factors for bursitis in weaner, grower and finisher pigs from 93 commercial farms in England.

C E Gillman1, A L Kilbride, P Ossent, L E Green.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study of 93 farms in England was carried out to estimate the prevalence and associated risk factors for bursitis. A total of 6250 pigs aged 6-22 weeks were examined for presence and severity of bursitis. Details of pen construction, pen quality and farm management were recorded including floor type, presence of bedding, condition of the floor and floor materials. The prevalence of bursitis was 41.2% and increased with each week of age (OR 1.1). Two-level logistic regression models were developed with the outcome as the proportion of pigs affected with bursitis in a pen. Pigs kept on soil floors with straw bedding were used as the reference level. In comparison with these soil floors, bursitis increased on concrete floors where the bedding was deep throughout (OR 4.6), deep in part (OR 3.7), and sparse throughout (OR 9.0), part slatted floors (OR 8.0), and fully slatted floors (OR 18.8). Slip or skid marks in the dunging area (OR 1.5), pigs observed slipping during the examination of the pen (OR 1.3) and wet floors (OR 3.6) were also associated with an increased risk of bursitis. The results indicate that bursitis is a common condition of growing pigs and that the associated risk factors for bursitis were a lack of bedding in the lying area, presence of voids and pen conditions which increased the likelihood of injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942176     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  6 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Correlation of animal-based parameters with environment-based parameters in an on-farm welfare assessment of growing pigs.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kang; Sangeun Bae; Hang Lee
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Prevalence of welfare outcomes in the weaner and finisher stages of the production cycle on 31 Irish pig farms.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla; Alison Hanlon; Laura Ann Boyle
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.146

4.  Skin lesion monitoring at slaughter on heavy pigs (170 kg): Welfare indicators and ham defects.

Authors:  Mattia Bottacini; Annalisa Scollo; Sandra A Edwards; Barbara Contiero; Martina Veloci; Vincenzo Pace; Flaviana Gottardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Abattoir-Based Measures to Assess Swine Welfare: Analysis of the Methods Adopted in European Slaughterhouses.

Authors:  Silvio De Luca; Emanuela Zanardi; Giovanni Loris Alborali; Adriana Ianieri; Sergio Ghidini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  The Welfare of Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Pigs from the Perspective of Traumatic Injuries Detected at Slaughterhouse Postmortem Inspection.

Authors:  Lenka Valkova; Vladimir Vecerek; Eva Voslarova; Michal Kaluza; Daniela Takacova
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.