Literature DB >> 17942092

Validity of spatial models of arsenic concentrations in private well water.

Jaymie R Meliker1, Gillian A AvRuskin, Melissa J Slotnick, Pierre Goovaerts, David Schottenfeld, Geoffrey M Jacquez, Jerome O Nriagu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Arsenic is a pervasive contaminant in underground aquifers worldwide, yet documentation of health effects associated with low-to-moderate concentrations (<100microg/L) has been stymied by uncertainties in assessing long-term exposure. A critical component of assessing exposure to arsenic in drinking water is the development of models for predicting arsenic concentrations in private well water in the past; however, these models are seldom validated. The objective of this paper is to validate alternative spatial models of arsenic concentrations in private well water in southeastern Michigan.
METHODS: From 1993 to 2002, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality analyzed arsenic concentrations in water from 6050 private wells. This dataset was used to develop several spatial models of arsenic concentrations in well water: proxy wells based on nearest-neighbor relationships, averages across geographic regions, and geostatistically derived estimates based on spatial correlation and geologic factors. Output from these models was validated using arsenic concentrations measured in 371 private wells from 2003 to 2006.
RESULTS: The geostatisical model and nearest-neighbor approach outperformed the models based on geographic averages. The geostatistical model produced the highest degree of correlation using continuous data (Pearson's r=0.61; Spearman's rank rho=0.46) while the nearest-neighbor approach produced the strongest correlation (kappa(weighted)=0.58) using an a priori categorization of arsenic concentrations (<5, 5-9.99, 10-19.99, > or = 20microg/L). When the maximum contaminant level was used as a cut-off in a two-category classification (<10, > or =10microg/L), the nearest-neighbor approach and geostatistical model had similar values for sensitivity (0.62-0.63), specificity (0.80), negative predictive value (0.85), positive predictive value (0.53), and percent agreement (75%). DISCUSSION: This validation study reveals that geostatistical modeling and nearest-neighbor approaches are effective spatial models for predicting arsenic concentrations in private well water. Further validation analyses in other regions are necessary to indicate how widely these findings may be generalized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942092      PMCID: PMC2271042          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2007.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  25 in total

1.  Case-control study of bladder cancer and drinking water arsenic in the western United States.

Authors:  Craig Steinmaus; Yan Yuan; Michael N Bates; Allan H Smith
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  An application of the holistochastic human exposure methodology to naturally occurring arsenic in Bangladesh drinking water.

Authors:  M L Serre; A Kolovos; G Christakos; K Modis
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Effects of time and point-of-use devices on arsenic levels in Southeastern Michigan drinking water, USA.

Authors:  Melissa J Slotnick; Jaymie R Meliker; Jerome O Nriagu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  GIS, geostatistics, metadata banking, and tree-based models for data analysis and mapping in environmental monitoring and epidemiology.

Authors:  Winfried Schröder
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Food-frequency questionnaires: a review of their design, validation and utilisation.

Authors:  J E Cade; V J Burley; D L Warm; R L Thompson; B M Margetts
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.800

6.  Limited temporal variability of arsenic concentrations in 20 wells monitored for 3 years in Araihazar, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Z Cheng; A van Geen; A A Seddique; K M Ahmed
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Case-control study of bladder cancer and exposure to arsenic in Argentina.

Authors:  Michael N Bates; Omar A Rey; Mary L Biggs; Claudia Hopenhayn; Lee E Moore; David Kalman; Craig Steinmaus; Allan H Smith
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Arsenic exposure and age and sex-specific risk for skin lesions: a population-based case-referent study in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mahfuzar Rahman; Marie Vahter; Nazmul Sohel; Muhammad Yunus; Mohammad Abdul Wahed; Peter Kim Streatfield; Eva-Charlotte Ekström; Lars Ake Persson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Effects and dose--response relationships of skin cancer and blackfoot disease with arsenic.

Authors:  W P Tseng
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  10 in total

1.  Predicting arsenic concentrations in groundwater of San Luis Valley, Colorado: implications for individual-level lifetime exposure assessment.

Authors:  Katherine A James; Jaymie R Meliker; Barbara E Buttenfield; Tim Byers; Gary O Zerbe; John E Hokanson; Julie A Marshall
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Incorporating individual-level distributions of exposure error in epidemiologic analyses: an example using arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jaymie R Meliker; Pierre Goovaerts; Geoffrey M Jacquez; Jerome O Nriagu
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Spatial modeling for groundwater arsenic levels in North Carolina.

Authors:  Dohyeong Kim; Marie Lynn Miranda; Joshua Tootoo; Phil Bradley; Alan E Gelfand
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Lifetime exposure to arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer: a population-based case-control study in Michigan, USA.

Authors:  Jaymie R Meliker; Melissa J Slotnick; Gillian A AvRuskin; David Schottenfeld; Geoffrey M Jacquez; Mark L Wilson; Pierre Goovaerts; Alfred Franzblau; Jerome O Nriagu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Spatial pattern of groundwater arsenic occurrence and association with bedrock geology in greater Augusta, Maine.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Hun Bok Jung; Charles W Culbertson; Robert G Marvinney; Marc C Loiselle; Daniel B Locke; Heidi Cheek; Hilary Thibodeau; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Genetic variation in glutathione S-transferase omega-1, arsenic methyltransferase and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase, arsenic exposure and bladder cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Priyanka T Iyer; Jerome O Nriagu; Greg R Keele; Shilpin Mehta; Jaymie R Meliker; Ethan M Lange; Ann G Schwartz; Kimberly A Zuhlke; David Schottenfeld; Kathleen A Cooney
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Local bladder cancer clusters in southeastern Michigan accounting for risk factors, covariates and residential mobility.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez; Chen Shi; Jaymie R Meliker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Use of Principal Components Analysis and Kriging to Predict Groundwater-Sourced Rural Drinking Water Quality in Saskatchewan.

Authors:  Lianne McLeod; Lalita Bharadwaj; Tasha Epp; Cheryl L Waldner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Ambient UVR and Environmental Arsenic Exposure in Relation to Cutaneous Melanoma in Iowa.

Authors:  Marvin E Langston; Heidi E Brown; Charles F Lynch; Denise J Roe; Leslie K Dennis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.614

10.  Water quality monitoring records for estimating tap water arsenic and nitrate: a validation study.

Authors:  Susan Searles Nielsen; Carrie M Kuehn; Beth A Mueller
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.