Ureteral access sheath use and stenting in ureteroscopy: effect on unplanned emergency room visits and cost.

PURPOSE: We studied the impact of stented and unstented ureteroscopy on unplanned emergency room (ER) return visits, medical costs, and whether use of a ureteral access sheath precluded uncomplicated ureteroscopy. PATIENT AND METHODS: A series of 161 consecutive patients undergoing ureteroscopy for renal or ureteral stones was evaluated retrospectively. We examined sex, age, stone size, stone location, use of a ureteral access sheath, use of a ureteral stent, unplanned ER visits, unplanned imaging, and interventions. Medical costs were calculated according to British Columbia Medical Services Plan rates.
RESULTS: In the 107 stented and 54 unstented patients, the mean stone sizes were 9 and 7 mm, respectively (P = 0.01), and ureteral access sheaths were used in 55% and 35% (P = 0.002). Stent use did not differ by patient age or sex or stone location. The ER return rates were 17% v 22% for the stented and unstented patients, respectively (P = 0.40), with emergency CT scans being performed in 28% v 75% of the returning patients (P = 0.02), hospital readmission in 22% v 58% (P = 0.05), and urgent decompression in 0 v 25% (P = 0.04). Among patients who were not stented, 37% of those treated using ureteral access sheaths v 14% treated without access sheaths returned to the ER (P = 0.04). The median costs were CDN dollars 1212 for stented and CDN dollars1071 for unstented patients (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The unplanned ER return rate is similar whether patients are stented or unstented after ureteroscopy. The median cost saving for unstented patients is approximately CDN dollars140. Use of a ureteral access sheath precludes uncomplicated ureteroscopy, and a ureteral stent should be placed in these cases.