Literature DB >> 17941772

Safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous renal surgery.

Ashraf Abou-Elela1, Ashraf Emran, Mostafa Abdel Mohsen, Ihab Reyad, Ahmed S Bedair, Mongy Abdel Kader.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We challenge the requirement for routine placement of a nephrostomy tube after percutaneous renal surgery, assessing the outcome, safety, and efficacy of tubeless procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 128 patients underwent tubeless percutaneous renal surgery from May 2001 to May 2004: stone extraction in 120 patients and endopyelotomy +/- stone extraction in 8. The stone sizes ranged from 2 to 7 cm with a mean of 4.1 cm. An external ureteral catheter was used in 120 patients and was removed after 24 hours if a retrograde study revealed no extravasation. An antegrade Double-J stent was used in 8 patients and removed 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. Among the 128 patients treated by the tubeless technique, we met situations that mandated insertion of a nephrostomy tube in 18.
RESULTS: The stone free-rate was 90.4%. The mean hospital stay was 1.7 days. The incidence of significant intraoperative bleeding was 1.5% and that of significant postoperative hematuria was 4.6%. Postoperative sonography revealed a small perirenal collection (<50 mL) in 10 patients (7.8%) and significant perirenal collections (100-250 mL) in 3 (2.3%). The postoperative retrograde study revealed minor extravasation in 14 patients (12%) and significant extravasation in 3 (2.3%)
CONCLUSION: Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery with an externalized ureteral catheter is a safe procedure that is suitable for any patient who can be rendered stone free with a single procedure regardless of the initial stone burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17941772     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Tubeless procedure reduces hospitalization and pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Marco Garofalo; Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone; Riccardo Schiavina; Eugenio Brunocilla; Francesco Sanguedolce; Marco Borghesi; Christian Rocca; Chiara Del Prete; Antonio Maria Morselli-Labate; Alexandro Paccapelo; Giuseppe Martorana
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Madhu Sudan Agrawal; Mayank Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Advances in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and patient selection: an update.

Authors:  Mitra R de Cógáin; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  'Nephrostomy-free' percutaneous nephrolithotomy: experience in a UK district general hospital.

Authors:  D R Yates; R K Safdar; P A Spencer; B T Parys
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The comparison of oxidative stress effect in classic and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Piotr Bryniarski; Sławomir Kasperczyk; Paweł Rajwa; Paweł Stelmach; Małgorzata Cisowska-Babraj; Andrzej Paradysz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.370

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.