Literature DB >> 1794049

Mononucleotide repeats are an abundant source of length variants in mouse genomic DNA.

T J Aitman1, C M Hearne, M A McAleer, J A Todd.   

Abstract

Microsatellite sequences, such as dinucleotide repeats, show a high degree of polymorphism in eukaryotic DNA. These sequences are convenient as genetic markers and can be analyzed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We have assessed the frequency of length variants in 18 mononucleotide repeats in mouse DNA and find that the variability is similar to that reported for dinucleotide repeats. Nine of the 18 repeat sequences (50%) have three or more alleles in the strains tested. Ten of these repeat sequences have been mapped using strain distribution patterns (SDPs) in recombinant inbred (RI) strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1794049     DOI: 10.1007/BF00352326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  18 in total

1.  Two-locus linkage analysis using recombinant inbred strains and Bayes' theorem.

Authors:  P E Neumann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  An interspecific backcross linkage map of the proximal half of mouse chromosome 14.

Authors:  J D Ceci; D M Kingsley; C M Silan; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers.

Authors:  D Tautz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A high frequency of length polymorphisms in repeated sequences adjacent to Alu sequences.

Authors:  G Zuliani; H H Hobbs
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A new family of interspersed repetitive DNA sequences in the mouse genome.

Authors:  W Gebhard; T Meitinger; J Höchtl; H G Zachau
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Isolation and characterization of the oligo(dA-dT) clusters and their flanking DNA segments in the rabbit genome.

Authors:  R A Flavell; F M Van den Berg; G C Grosveld
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  The gene and the pseudogene for mouse p53 cellular tumor antigen are located on different chromosomes.

Authors:  H H Czosnek; B Bienz; D Givol; R Zakut-Houri; D D Pravtcheva; F H Ruddle; M Oren
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  D Tautz; M Renz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A novel repeated element with Z-DNA-forming potential is widely found in evolutionarily diverse eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  H Hamada; M G Petrino; T Kakunaga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Towards construction of a high resolution map of the mouse genome using PCR-analysed microsatellites.

Authors:  J M Love; A M Knight; M A McAleer; J A Todd
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  35 in total

1.  Heritability of the maternal meiotic drive system linked to Om and high-resolution mapping of the Responder locus in mouse.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel De Villena; E de La Casa-Esperón; J W Williams; J M Malette; M Rosa; C Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Mouse chromosome 11.

Authors:  A M Buchberg; M S Buckwalter; S A Camper
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  Mouse chromosome 12.

Authors:  P D'Eustachio
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 4.  Mouse chromosome 3.

Authors:  M H Meisler; J A Todd; N Rodrigues; E K Wakeland; M F Seldin
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Mouse chromosome 7.

Authors:  E M Rinchik; T Magnuson; B Holdener-Kenny; G Kelsey; A Bianchi; C J Conti; F Chartier; K A Brown; S D Brown; J Peters
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 6.  Mouse chromosome 1.

Authors:  M F Seldin
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 7.  Mouse chromosome 15.

Authors:  B A Mock; P E Neumann; J T Eppig; K E Huppi
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 8.  Mouse chromosome 5.

Authors:  C A Kozak; D A Stephenson
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 9.  Mouse chromosome 9.

Authors:  D M Kingsley
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 10.  Mapping the mouse genome: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  W F Dietrich; N G Copeland; D J Gilbert; J C Miller; N A Jenkins; E S Lander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.