Literature DB >> 17940161

Nitrogen recycling through the gut and the nitrogen economy of ruminants: an asynchronous symbiosis.

C K Reynolds1, N B Kristensen.   

Abstract

The extensive development of the ruminant forestomach sets apart their N economy from that of nonruminants in a number of respects. Extensive pregastric fermentation alters the profile of protein reaching the small intestine, largely through the transformation of nitrogenous compounds into microbial protein. This process is fueled primarily by carbohydrate fermentation and includes extensive recycling of N between the body and gut lumen pools. Nitrogen recycling occurs via blood and gut lumen exchanges of urea and NH(3), as well as endogenous gut and secretory N entry into the gut lumen, and the subsequent digestion and absorption of microbial and endogenous protein. Factors controlling urea transfer to the gut from blood, including the contributions of urea transporters, remain equivocal. Ammonia produced by microbial degradation of urea and dietary and endogenous AA is utilized by microbial fermentation or absorbed and primarily converted to urea. Therefore, microbial growth and carbohydrate fermentation affect the extent of NH(3) absorption and urea N recycling and excretion. The extensive recycling of N to the rumen represents an evolutionary advantage of the ruminant in terms of absorbable protein supply during periods of dietary protein deficiency, or asynchronous carbohydrate and protein supply, but incurs a cost of greater N intakes, especially in terms of excess N excretion. Efforts to improve the efficiency of N utilization in ruminants by synchronizing fermentable energy and N availability have generally met with limited success with regards to production responses. In contrast, imposing asynchrony through oscillating dietary protein concentration, or infrequent supplementation, surprisingly has not negatively affected production responses unless the frequency of supplementation is less than once every 3 d. In some cases, oscillation of dietary protein concentration has improved N retention compared with animals fed an equal amount of dietary protein on a daily basis. This may reflect benefits of Orn cycle adaptations and sustained recycling of urea to the gut. The microbial symbiosis of the ruminant is inherently adaptable to asynchronous N and energy supply. Recycling of urea to the gut buffers the effect of irregular dietary N supply such that intuitive benefits of rumen synchrony in terms of the efficiency of N utilization are typically not observed in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17940161     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  34 in total

1.  Effects of dietary fibre and protein on urea transport across the cecal mucosa of piglets.

Authors:  F Stumpff; U Lodemann; A G Van Kessel; R Pieper; S Klingspor; K Wolf; H Martens; J Zentek; J R Aschenbach
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Lactobacillus reuteri 100-23 modulates urea hydrolysis in the murine stomach.

Authors:  Charlotte M Wilson; Diane Loach; Blair Lawley; Tracey Bell; Ian M Sims; Paul W O'Toole; Aldert Zomer; Gerald W Tannock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Replacement of wheat bran with spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus indica Mill cv Gigante) and urea in the diets of Holstein x Gyr heifers.

Authors:  Carolina Corrêa de Figueiredo Monteiro; Airon Aparecido Silva de Melo; Marcelo Andrade Ferreira; José Mauricio de Souza Campos; Julyana Sena Rodrigues Souza; Evannielly Thuanny Dos Santos Silva; Rafael de Paula Xavier de Andrade; Emmanuelle Cordeiro da Silva
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Associative effects of wet distiller's grains plus solubles and tannin-rich peanut skin supplementation on in vitro rumen fermentation, greenhouse gas emissions, and microbial changes1.

Authors:  Byeng Ryel Min; Lana Castleberry; Heather Allen; David Parker; Heidi Waldrip; David Brauer; William Willis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Revisiting the Effects of Different Dietary Sources of Selenium on the Health and Performance of Dairy Animals: a Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Adeel Arshad; Hossam Mahrous Ebeid; Faiz-Ul Hassan
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Effect of feeding condensed tannins in high protein finishing diets containing corn distillers grains on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and route of nitrogen excretion in beef cattle.

Authors:  Karen M Koenig; Karen A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effect of carbohydrate source and cottonseed meal level in the concentrate: IV. Feed intake, rumen fermentation and milk production in milking cows.

Authors:  Metha Wanapat; Ruangyote Pilajun; Peter Rowlinson
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  Effects of increasing dietary protein supplies on milk yield, milk composition, and nitrogen use efficiency in lactating buffalo.

Authors:  Muhammad Naveed-Ul-Haque; Muhammad Uzair Akhtar; Rizwan Munnawar; Saba Anwar; Anjum Khalique; Murtaza Ali Tipu; Fayyaz Ahmad; Muhammad Qamer Shahid
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.559

9.  Influence of forage level and corn grain processing on whole-body urea kinetics, and serosal-to-mucosal urea flux and expression of urea transporters and aquaporins in the ovine ruminal, duodenal, and cecal epithelia.

Authors:  Karen A Scott; Gregory B Penner; Timothy Mutsvangwa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  New ways for an old cation.

Authors:  Martin Diener
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.