Literature DB >> 17939981

Mountain chickadees discriminate between potential cache pilferers and non-pilferers.

Vladimir V Pravosudov1.   

Abstract

Evolution of complex cognition in animals has been linked to complex social behaviour. One of the costs of sociality is increased competition for food which may be reduced by food caching, but cache theft may undermine the benefits of caching. In birds, sophisticated food-caching-related cognition has been demonstrated only for corvids and attributed to their highly social behaviour. Many non-corvid food-caching species exhibit similar complex social behaviour and here I provide experimental evidence that mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli) adjust their caching strategies depending on social context. Chickadees were allowed to cache seeds in the presence of potential cache pilferer, either conspecific or heterospecific (red-breasted nuthatch, Sitta canadensis) and a non-pilferer (dark-eyed junco, Junco hyemalis) positioned at the opposite sides of the experimental arena. Available caching sites were either exposed to these observers or hidden from their view while the cacher could always see both observers. Chickadees chose caching sites that were hidden from direct view of the potential pilferers while caching in direct view of the non-pilferers. When no pilferers were present, chickadees made equal use of all available caching substrates and there were no differences in the amount of caching in the presence or absence of pilferers. These results suggest that (i) chickadees may be able to recognize potential cache thieves, both conspecific and heterospecific, and adjust their caching strategies to minimize potential cache pilferage and (ii) chickadees appear to discriminate between caching sites that can or cannot be seen by observers, which may allow them to control visual information available to potential pilferers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17939981      PMCID: PMC2562407          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  Effects of demanding foraging conditions on cache retrival accuracy in food-caching mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli).

Authors:  V V Pravosudov; N S Clayton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes.

Authors:  Nathan J Emery; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Evolution of the avian brain and intelligence.

Authors:  Nathan J Emery; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Ravens, Corvus corax, differentiate between knowledgeable and ignorant competitors.

Authors:  Thomas Bugnyar; Bernd Heinrich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Cache protection strategies by western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica): hiding food in the shade.

Authors:  Joanna M Dally; Nathan J Emery; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Leading a conspecific away from food in ravens (Corvus corax)?

Authors:  Thomas Bugnyar; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Western scrub-jays ( Aphelocoma californica) use cognitive strategies to protect their caches from thieving conspecifics.

Authors:  Nathan J Emery; Joanna M Dally; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays.

Authors:  N S Clayton; A Dickinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Social cognition by food-caching corvids. The western scrub-jay as a natural psychologist.

Authors:  Nicola S Clayton; Joanna M Dally; Nathan J Emery
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Food-caching western scrub-jays keep track of who was watching when.

Authors:  Joanna M Dally; Nathan J Emery; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Conspecific presence, but not pilferage, influences pinyon jays' (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) caching behavior.

Authors:  Alizée Vernouillet; Hera J M Casidsid; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Integrating ecology, psychology and neurobiology within a food-hoarding paradigm.

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Tom V Smulders
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Chickadees are selfish group members when it comes to food caching.

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Timothy C Roth; Lara D Ladage
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Role of the blood-brain barrier in the evolution of feeding and cognition.

Authors:  William A Banks
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Food discovery is associated with different reliance on social learning and lower cognitive flexibility across environments in a food-caching bird.

Authors:  Virginia K Heinen; Angela M Pitera; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Lauren M Benedict; Eli S Bridge; Damien R Farine; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Foraging intention affects whether willow tits call to attract members of mixed-species flocks.

Authors:  Toshitaka N Suzuki; Nobuyuki Kutsukake
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.