Literature DB >> 17939885

Bioactive properties of nanostructured porous silicon for enhancing electrode to neuron interfaces.

K A Moxon1, S Hallman, A Aslani, N M Kalkhoran, P I Lelkes.   

Abstract

Many different types of microelectrodes have been developed for use as a direct brain-machine interface (BMI) to chronically recording single-neuron action potentials from ensembles of neurons. Unfortunately, the recordings from these microelectrode devices are not consistent and often last for only on the order of months. For most microelectrode types, the loss of these recordings is not due to failure of the electrodes, but most likely due to damage to surrounding tissue that results in the formation of non-conductive glial scar. Since the extracellular matrix consists of nanostructured fibrous protein assemblies, we have postulated that neurons may prefer a more complex surface structure than the smooth surface typical of thin-film microelectrodes. This porous structure could then act as a drug-delivery reservoir to deliver bioactive agents to aid in the repair or survival of cells around the microelectrode, further reducing the glial scar. We, therefore, investigated the suitability of a nanoporous silicon surface layer to increase the biocompatibility of our thin film ceramic-insulated multisite electrodes. In vitro testing demonstrated increased extension of neurites from PC12 pheochromocytoma cells on porous silicon surfaces compared to smooth silicon surfaces. Moreover, the size of the pores and the pore coverage did not interfere with this bioactive surface property, suggesting that large highly porous nanostructured surfaces can be used for drug delivery. The most porous nanoporous surfaces were then tested in vivo and found to be more biocompatible than smooth surface, producing less glial activation and allowing more neurons to remain close to the device. Collectively, these results support our hypothesis that nanoporous silicon may be an ideal material to improve biocompatibility of chronically implanted microelectrodes. The next step in this work will be to apply these surfaces to active microelectrodes, use them to deliver bioactive agents, and test that they do improve neural recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17939885     DOI: 10.1163/156856207782177882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  15 in total

1.  Ceramic-based microelectrode arrays: recording surface characteristics and topographical analysis.

Authors:  Pooja M Talauliker; David A Price; Jason J Burmeister; Silpa Nagari; Jorge E Quintero; Francois Pomerleau; Peter Huettl; J Todd Hastings; Greg A Gerhardt
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Quantitative assessment of neuronal differentiation in three-dimensional collagen gels using enhanced green fluorescence protein expressing PC12 pheochromocytoma cells.

Authors:  Hadar Arien-Zakay; Shimon Lecht; Anat Perets; Blair Roszell; Peter I Lelkes; Philip Lazarovici
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.444

3.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 4.  A review of organic and inorganic biomaterials for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Pouria Fattahi; Guang Yang; Gloria Kim; Mohammad Reza Abidian
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 5.  Biocompatibility assessment of Si-based nano- and micro-particles.

Authors:  Hamsa Jaganathan; Biana Godin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  In vivo evaluation of safety of nanoporous silicon carriers following single and multiple dose intravenous administrations in mice.

Authors:  T Tanaka; B Godin; R Bhavane; R Nieves-Alicea; J Gu; X Liu; C Chiappini; J R Fakhoury; S Amra; A Ewing; Q Li; I J Fidler; M Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.875

7.  Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Victor Pikov; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 8.  Progress towards biocompatible intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing applications.

Authors:  Mehdi Jorfi; John L Skousen; Christoph Weder; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Biocompatibility of intracortical microelectrodes: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Cristina Marin; Eduardo Fernández
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2010-05-28

10.  Preventing neuronal damage and inflammation in vivo during cortical microelectrode implantation through the use of poloxamer P-188.

Authors:  A Misra; P Kondaveeti; J Nissanov; K Barbee; P Shewokis; L Rioux; K A Moxon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.