INTRODUCTION: We attempted to assess the feasibility of a 1.6-mm isotropic voxel diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography at 3T in visualizing nerve bundles in the limbic system. METHODS: We examined 20 healthy volunteers by conventional DTI with a voxel size of 1.6 x 1.6 x 3.0 mm and by high-resolution DTI with a voxel size of 1.6 x 1.6 x 1.6 mm and generated tractographs of three limbic nerve bundles: the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus. We visually assessed whether these bundles reached their targets and compared their diffusion parameters between the two techniques. RESULTS: The entire pathways of the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus were more readily visualized by high-resolution DTI than by conventional DTI. Among these, the fimbria of the fornix and the uncinate fasciculus adjacent to the temporal pole were identified more frequently by high-resolution DTI (visualization rate 83 and 100%, respectively) than by conventional DTI (visualization rate 63 and 83%, respectively) at a statistical significance of P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Fractional anisotropy values in the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus by high-resolution DTI were significantly higher than those by conventional DTI (P < 0.01); in contrast, the apparent diffusion coefficient values of all these fibers except that of the fornix remained unchanged between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: The 1.6-mm istropic voxel DTI at 3T is a feasible visualization tool and can improve the precision of tracking nerve bundles of the limbic system.
INTRODUCTION: We attempted to assess the feasibility of a 1.6-mm isotropic voxel diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography at 3T in visualizing nerve bundles in the limbic system. METHODS: We examined 20 healthy volunteers by conventional DTI with a voxel size of 1.6 x 1.6 x 3.0 mm and by high-resolution DTI with a voxel size of 1.6 x 1.6 x 1.6 mm and generated tractographs of three limbic nerve bundles: the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus. We visually assessed whether these bundles reached their targets and compared their diffusion parameters between the two techniques. RESULTS: The entire pathways of the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus were more readily visualized by high-resolution DTI than by conventional DTI. Among these, the fimbria of the fornix and the uncinate fasciculus adjacent to the temporal pole were identified more frequently by high-resolution DTI (visualization rate 83 and 100%, respectively) than by conventional DTI (visualization rate 63 and 83%, respectively) at a statistical significance of P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Fractional anisotropy values in the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus by high-resolution DTI were significantly higher than those by conventional DTI (P < 0.01); in contrast, the apparent diffusion coefficient values of all these fibers except that of the fornix remained unchanged between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: The 1.6-mm istropic voxel DTI at 3T is a feasible visualization tool and can improve the precision of tracking nerve bundles of the limbic system.
Authors: Derek Kenton Jones; Steve Charles Rees Williams; David Gasston; Mark Andrew Horsfield; Andrew Simmons; Robert Howard Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: T Jaermann; G Crelier; K P Pruessmann; X Golay; T Netsch; A M C van Muiswinkel; S Mori; P C M van Zijl; A Valavanis; S Kollias; P Boesiger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Marek Kubicki; Stephan E Maier; Carl-Frederik Westin; Hatsuho Mamata; Hal Ersner-Hershfield; Raul Estepar; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert W McCarley; Martha E Shenton Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: T Taoka; S Iwasaki; M Sakamoto; H Nakagawa; A Fukusumi; K Myochin; S Hirohashi; T Hoshida; K Kichikawa Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Khader M Hasan; Amal Iftikhar; Arash Kamali; Larry A Kramer; Manzar Ashtari; Paul T Cirino; Andrew C Papanicolaou; Jack M Fletcher; Linda Ewing-Cobbs Journal: Brain Res Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Kathleen K S Hui; Ovidiu Marina; Joshua D Claunch; Erika E Nixon; Jiliang Fang; Jing Liu; Ming Li; Vitaly Napadow; Mark Vangel; Nikos Makris; Suk-Tak Chan; Kenneth K Kwong; Bruce R Rosen Journal: Brain Res Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Gonzalo Barrio-Arranz; Rodrigo de Luis-García; Antonio Tristán-Vega; Marcos Martín-Fernández; Santiago Aja-Fernández Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 3.240