Literature DB >> 17938756

[Procedure guideline for iodine-131 whole-body scintigraphy for differentiated thyroid cancer (version 3)].

M Dietlein1, J Dressler, W Eschner, F Grünwald, M Lassmann, B Leisner, M Luster, C Reiners, H Schicha, O Schober.   

Abstract

Version 3 of the procedure guideline for (131)I whole-body scintigraphy (WBS) is the counterpart to the procedure guideline for radioiodine therapy (version 3) and specify the interdisciplinary guideline for thyroid cancer of the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft concerning the nuclear medicine part. (131)I WBS 3-6 months after (131)I ablation remains a standard procedure in an endemic area for thyroid nodules and the high frequency of subtotal surgical procedures. Follow-up without (131)I WBS is only justified if the following preconditions are fulfilled: low-risk group pT1-2, pN0 M0 with histopathologically confirmed pN0, (131)I uptake <2%, (131)I WBS during ablation without any suspicious lesion, stimulated thyroglobulin (Tg)-level 3-6 months after ablation <2 ng/mL, and absence of anti-thyroglobulin-antibodies with normal recovery-testing. If patients from the low-risk group show normal (131)I WBS 3-6 months after ablation and stimulated Tg is of <2 ng/mL, there will be no need for additional routine (131)I WBS. If patients from the high-risk group show normal (131)I WBS and stimulated Tg-level of <2 ng/mL 3-6 months after ablation, the follow-up care should include repeated stimulated Tg-measurements. If the Tg-level remains below 2 ng/mL, an additional (131)I WBS will be not necessary. The recommended intervals for stimulated Tg-testing are adapted to the prior intervals for (131)I WBS-testing in the high-risk group. Increased anti-thyroglobulin-antibodies or incomplete recovery-testing make an individual strategy of follow-up care necessary, which include (131)I WBS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nuklearmedizin        ISSN: 0029-5566            Impact factor:   1.379


  5 in total

Review 1.  Why radioiodine remnant ablation is right for most patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Frederik A Verburg; Markus Dietlein; Michael Lassmann; Markus Luster; Christoph Reiners
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  One should not just read what one believes: the nearly irresolvable issue of producing truly objective, evidence-based guidelines for the management of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Markus Dietlein; F A Verburg; M Luster; C Reiners; F Pitoia; H Schicha
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Less is more: reconsidering the need for regular use of diagnostic whole body radioiodine scintigraphy in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Christian Pirich; Gregor Schweighofer-Zwink
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Diagnostic 131I whole-body scintigraphy 1 year after thyroablative therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: correlation of results to the individual risk profile and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Frank Berger; Ulla Friedrich; Peter Knesewitsch; Klaus Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Recombinant human thyrotropin versus thyroid hormone withdrawal in differentiated thyroid carcinoma follow-up: a single center experience.

Authors:  M Sahin; B I Aydoğan; E Özkan; R Emral; S Güllü; M F Erdogan; D Çorapçıoğlu
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.877

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.