Literature DB >> 17938391

Knee buckling: prevalence, risk factors, and associated limitations in function.

David T Felson1, Jingbo Niu, Christine McClennan, Burton Sack, Piran Aliabadi, David J Hunter, Ali Guermazi, Martin Englund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee buckling is common in persons with advanced knee osteoarthritis and after orthopedic procedures. Its prevalence in the community is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of knee buckling in the community, its associated risk factors, and its relation to functional limitation.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, population-based study.
SETTING: The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. PARTICIPANTS: 2351 men and women age 36 to 94 years (median, 63.5 years). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were asked whether they had experienced knee buckling or "giving way" and whether it led to falling. They were also asked about knee pain and limitations in function by using the Short Form-12 and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, had isometric tests of quadriceps strength, and underwent weight-bearing radiography and magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Radiographs were scored for osteoarthritis by using the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, and magnetic resonance images were read for anterior cruciate ligament tears. The relationship of buckling to functional limitation was examined by using logistic regression that adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and knee pain severity.
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight participants (11.8%) experienced at least 1 episode of knee buckling within the past 3 months; of these persons, 217 (78.1%) experienced more than 1 episode and 35 (12.6%) fell during an episode. Buckling was independently associated with the presence of knee pain and with quadriceps weakness. Over half of those with buckling had no osteoarthritis on radiography. Persons with knee buckling had worse physical function than those without buckling, even after adjustment for severity of knee pain and weakness. For example, 46.9% of participants with buckling and 21.7% of those without buckling reported limitations in their work (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7]). LIMITATION: Causal inferences are limited because of the study's cross-sectional design.
CONCLUSION: In adults, knee buckling is common and is associated with functional loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938391     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  63 in total

1.  Self-reported knee instability and activity limitations in patients with knee osteoarthritis: results of the Amsterdam osteoarthritis cohort.

Authors:  Martin van der Esch; Jesper Knoop; Marike van der Leeden; Ramon Voorneman; Martijn Gerritsen; Dick Reiding; Suzanne Romviel; Dirk L Knol; Willem F Lems; Joost Dekker; Leo D Roorda
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Do worsening knee radiographs mean greater chances of severe functional limitation?

Authors:  Daniel K White; Yuqing Zhang; Jingbo Niu; Julie J Keysor; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Tuhina Neogi
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Altered tibiofemoral joint contact mechanics and kinematics in patients with knee osteoarthritis and episodic complaints of joint instability.

Authors:  Shawn Farrokhi; Carrie A Voycheck; Brian A Klatt; Jonathan A Gustafson; Scott Tashman; G Kelley Fitzgerald
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Predictors of self-reported knee instability among patients with knee osteoarthritis: results of the Amsterdam osteoarthritis cohort.

Authors:  Martin van der Esch; Marike van der Leeden; Leo D Roorda; Willem F Lems; Joost Dekker
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Association between anteroposterior laxity in mid-range flexion and subjective healing of instability after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoharu Mochizuki; Osamu Tanifuji; Takashi Sato; Hiroki Hijikata; Hiroshi Koga; Satoshi Watanabe; Yukimasa Higano; Akihiro Ariumi; Takayuki Murayama; Hiroshi Yamagiwa; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The association between antagonist hamstring coactivation and episodes of knee joint shifting and buckling.

Authors:  N A Segal; M C Nevitt; R D Welborn; U-S D T Nguyen; J Niu; C E Lewis; D T Felson; L Frey-Law
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to determine the compartmental prevalence of knee joint structural damage.

Authors:  J J Stefanik; J Niu; K D Gross; F W Roemer; A Guermazi; D T Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  The Association of Vibratory Perception and Muscle Strength With the Incidence and Worsening of Knee Instability: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  Najia Shakoor; David T Felson; Jingbo Niu; Uyen-Sa Nguyen; Neil A Segal; Jasvinder A Singh; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 10.995

9.  Instability, laxity, and physical function in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Laura C Schmitt; G Kelley Fitzgerald; Andrew S Reisman; Katherine S Rudolph
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-09-26

10.  Association between radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis and pain: results from two cohort studies.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; David Felson; Jingbo Niu; Michael Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; Piran Aliabadi; Burt Sack; James Torner; Lawrence Bradley; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.