Literature DB >> 17938311

Spectrum and risk factors of complications after gastric bypass.

Guilherme M Campos1, Ruxandra Ciovica, Stanley J Rogers, Andrew M Posselt, Eric Vittinghoff, Mark Takata, John P Cello.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the spectrum of and risk factors for complications after gastric bypass (GBP).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All morbidly obese patients who underwent open or laparoscopic GBP between January 2003 and December 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications were stratified by grade: grade I, only bedside procedure; grade II, therapeutic intervention but without lasting disability; grade III, irreversible deficits; and grade IV, death. Data were analyzed using logistic regression to identify independent risk factors of complications after GBP. Predictors investigated were age, race, sex, marital and insurance status, body mass index, obesity-associated comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class, operating room time, open or laparoscopic approach, and surgeon experience.
RESULTS: Of the 404 morbidly obese patients who underwent consecutive open (n = 72) or laparoscopic (n = 332) GBP, 74 (18.3%) experienced 107 complications. Grade I and II complications were more frequent after open GBP (grade I, 19.4% after open vs 3.9% after laparoscopic operations, P < .001; grade II, 20.8% after open vs 8.4% after laparoscopic operations, P < .001), and 55% were wound related. Grades III and IV complications occurred in only 4 patients (1%), and frequency was similar for open and laparoscopic cases. Three factors were independently predictive of complications: diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.3; P = .02), early surgeon experience (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.2; P = .001), and open approach (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.1-7.3; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Complications occurred in 18.3% of patients, but 95% were treated without leading to lasting disability. Presence of diabetes, early surgeon experience, and an open approach are risk factors of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938311     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.142.10.969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  20 in total

1.  Fewer gastrojejunostomy strictures and marginal ulcers with absorbable suture.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Vasquez; D Wayne Overby; Timothy M Farrell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Volume and outcome relationship in bariatric surgery in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  Mehraneh D Jafari; Fariba Jafari; Monica T Young; Brian R Smith; Michael J Phalen; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk Stratification Models: How Well do They Predict Adverse Outcomes in a Large Dutch Bariatric Cohort?

Authors:  Noëlle Geubbels; L Maurits de Brauw; Yair I Z Acherman; Arnold W J M van de Laar; Sjoerd C Bruin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  A new and standardized approach for trocar placement in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Namir Katkhouda; Ashkan Moazzez; Sarah Popek; Shirin Towfigh; Brett Cohen; Billy Lam; Valy Boulom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Diagnostic medical radiation dose in patients after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Tamara N Oei; Paul B Shyn; Usha Govindarajulu; Richard Flint
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  A nomogram for predicting surgical complications in bariatric surgery patients.

Authors:  Patricia L Turner; Leif Saager; Jarrod Dalton; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Dmitry Roberman; Pamela Melara; Andrea Kurz; Alparslan Turan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Predictors of Risk and Success of Obesity Surgery.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Javier R de la Garza; Fabian S Werthmann; Laura Benner; Christian Tapking; Emir Karadza; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Adrian T Billeter; Hannes G Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Beat Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.942

8.  Surgeon case volume and readmissions after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: more is less.

Authors:  Adam C Celio; Kevin R Kasten; Matthew B Burruss; Walter J Pories; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Factors associated with weight loss after gastric bypass.

Authors:  Guilherme M Campos; Charlotte Rabl; Kathleen Mulligan; Andrew Posselt; Stanley J Rogers; Antonio C Westphalen; Feng Lin; Eric Vittinghoff
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09

10.  Improvement in peripheral glucose uptake after gastric bypass surgery is observed only after substantial weight loss has occurred and correlates with the magnitude of weight lost.

Authors:  Guilherme M Campos; Charlotte Rabl; Sofia Peeva; Ruxandra Ciovica; Madhu Rao; Jean-Marc Schwarz; Peter Havel; Morris Schambelan; Kathleen Mulligan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.