Literature DB >> 17937923

Longitudinal cohort study of patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy. IV. Visual field results at baseline.

Lynn K Gordon1, Dominique Monnet, Gary N Holland, Antoine P Brézin, Fei Yu, Ralph D Levinson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe visual field parameters at baseline examination of 80 participants in a longitudinal cohort study of birdshot chorioretinopathy and to identify relationships between these parameters and visual acuity, symptoms, clinical findings, and results of laboratory tests.
DESIGN: Single-center cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Standardized Fastpac, full-threshold Humphrey 30-2 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) visual field studies were performed for both eyes of all patients. A standardized protocol identified foveal threshold and mean deviation, specified categories of total deviation, and assigned visual field pattern descriptors. These parameters were compared with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), symptoms, color confusion score (CCS), cataract, vitreous inflammatory reactions, retinal vasculitis, birdshot lesion characteristics, and ocular coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography parameters.
RESULTS: Each visual field parameter was closely related to the others, although mean deviation could be abnormal in the presence of a near normal foveal threshold. Mean deviation was related to BCVA, but the correlation was moderate (the Spearman correlation, -0.55; P < .001). It was also related to CCS and the symptoms of blurry vision, poor contrast sensitivity, and nyctalopia. The most common visual field patterns were multiple foci and arcuate defects. Among clinical and laboratory findings, visual field parameters were most closely related to absence of the third highly reflective band on OCT (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy may have a variety of visual field abnormalities, even with normal BCVA. Abnormalities seem to be associated with retinal damage. Automated visual field testing may provide objective measures for monitoring disease activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17937923     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  7 in total

Review 1.  New concepts in the appraisal and management of birdshot retinochoroiditis, a global perspective.

Authors:  Marina Papadia; Carl P Herbort
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  The spectrum of fundus autofluorescence findings in birdshot chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Giuliari; David M Hinkle; C Stephen Foster
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Alterations of color vision and central visual field in patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome.

Authors:  Peizeng Yang; Min Sun; Xiaoli Liu; Hongyan Zhou; Wang Fang; Li Wang; Aize Kijlstra
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect       Date:  2012-02-02

4.  Classification Criteria for Birdshot Chorioretinitis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.488

Review 5.  Birdshot retinochoroidopathy.

Authors:  Albert T Vitale
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

6.  Spatial agreement between Goldmann visual field defects and fundus autofluorescence in patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Loren S Jack; Aniruddha Agarwal; Yasir Jamal Sepah; Quan Dong Nguyen
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect       Date:  2016-05-31

Review 7.  Birdshot Chorioretinopathy: A Review.

Authors:  Elodie Bousquet; Pierre Duraffour; Louis Debillon; Swathi Somisetty; Dominique Monnet; Antoine P Brézin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.