Literature DB >> 17937743

The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population--prevalence and main findings.

Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen1, Allan Linneberg, Torkil Menné, Jeanne Duus Johansen.   

Abstract

A substantial number of studies have investigated the prevalence of contact allergy in the general population and in unselected subgroups of the general population. The aim of this review was to determine a median prevalence and summarize the main findings from studies on contact allergy in the general population. Published research mainly originates from North America and Western Europe. The median prevalence of contact allergy to at least 1 allergen was 21.2% (range 12.5-40.6%), and the weighted average prevalence was 19.5%, based on data collected on all age groups and all countries between 1966 and 2007. The most prevalent contact allergens were nickel, thimerosal, and fragrance mix. The median nickel allergy prevalence was 8.6% (range 0.7-27.8%) and demonstrates that nickel was an important cause of contact allergy in the general population and that it was widespread in both men and women. Numerous studies demonstrated that pierced ears were a significant risk factor for nickel allergy. Nickel was a risk factor for hand eczema in women. Finally, heavy smoking was associated with contact allergy, mostly in women. Population-based epidemiological studies are considered a prerequisite in the surveillance of national and international contact allergy epidemics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17937743     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01220.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  89 in total

1.  Tri-culture system for pro-hapten sensitizer identification and potency classification.

Authors:  Serom Lee; Talia Greenstein; Lingting Shi; Tim Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin Yarmush
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2018-06-29

2.  Symptomatic oral lesions may be associated with contact allergy to substances in oral hygiene products.

Authors:  K R Larsen; J D Johansen; J Reibel; C Zachariae; A M L Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Trace elements concentration and distributions in coal and coal mining wastes and their environmental and health impacts in Shaanxi, China.

Authors:  Rahib Hussain; Kunli Luo; Zhao Chao; Zhao Xiaofeng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  [Dermatology seminar Derma Update: Comprehensive continuing medical education over 2 days].

Authors:  U Ayazpoor
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Assessment of the risk of fragrance allergy in the general population: challenges and methodological issues.

Authors:  Luigi Naldi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose-response modeling using feature elimination instead of quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; James M McKim; Thomas Hartung; Andre Kleensang; Vanessa Sá-Rocha
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.446

7.  Predicting full thickness skin sensitization using a support vector machine.

Authors:  Serom Lee; David Xu Dong; Rohit Jindal; Tim Maguire; Bhaskar Mitra; Rene Schloss; Martin Yarmush
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  Abating Mercury Exposure in Young Children Should Include Thimerosal-Free Vaccines.

Authors:  José G Dórea
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.996

9.  [Not Available].

Authors:  M Worm; U Lippert; J Geier; A Schnuch
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.751

10.  [Contact allergies in the elderly].

Authors:  V Mahler
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.