Literature DB >> 17937302

Evaluation and comparison of portable emissions measurement systems and federal reference methods for emissions from a back-up generator and a diesel truck operated on a chassis dynamometer.

Thomas D Durbin1, Kent Johnson, David R Cocker, J Wayne Miller, Hector Maldonado, Atul Shah, Carl Ensfield, Chris Weaver, Mike Akard, Neal Harvey, James Symon, Thomas Lanni, William D Bachalo, Greg Payne, Greg Smallwood, Manfred Linke.   

Abstract

There is considerable interest in portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) for emission inventory and regulatory applications. For this study, four commercial PEMS were compared with a Federal Reference Method (FRM) for measuring emissions from a back-up generator (BUG) over steady-state loads and a diesel truck on transient and steady-state chassis dynamometer tests. The agreement between the PEMS and the FRM varied depending on the pollutant and the particular PEMS tested for both the BUG and chassis dynamometer testing. The best performing PEMS for both the BUG and chassis testing was within approximately 12% for NOx of the FRM. For the BUG testing, several PEMS showed agreement with the FRM within approximately 5% for CO2. For the chassis dynamometer testing, the best PEMS showed agreement typically within approximately 5% for CO2. PM measurements for the BUG testing were low compared to the FRM, with the best measurements approximately 20% lower. For the chassis testing, two PM PEMS showed a good correlation but a high bias, while the correlation was worse for the other two PEMS. For each emissions component, some PEMS under different test conditions showed considerably larger deviations than those for the best performing PEMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17937302     DOI: 10.1021/es0622251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  2 in total

1.  Variability in Observation-based Onroad Emission Constraints from a Near-road Environment.

Authors:  Heather Simon; Barron H Henderson; R Chris Owen; Kristen M Foley; Michelle G Snyder; Sue Kimbrough
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty.

Authors:  Barouch Giechaskiel; Michael Clairotte; Victor Valverde-Morales; Pierre Bonnel; Zlatko Kregar; Vicente Franco; Panagiota Dilara
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.498

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.