OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) after cardiac arrest (CA) improves outcomes in a fraction of patients. To enhance the administration of TH, we studied brain electrophysiological monitoring in determining the benefit of early initiation of TH compared to conventional administration in a rat model. METHODS: Using an asphyxial CA model, we compared the benefit of immediate hypothermia (IH, T=33 degrees C, immediately post-resuscitation, maintained 6h) to conventional hypothermia (CH, T=33 degrees C, starting 1h post-resuscitation, maintained 12h) via surface cooling. We tracked quantitative EEG using relative entropy (qEEG) with outcome verification by serial Neurological Deficit Score (NDS) and quantitative brain histopathological damage scoring (HDS). Thirty-two rats were divided into 4 groups based on CH/IH and 7/9-min duration of asphyxial CA. Four sham rats were included for evaluation of the effect of hypothermia on qEEG. RESULTS: The 72-h NDS of the IH group was significantly better than the CH group for both 7-min (74/63; median, IH/CH, p<0.001) and 9-min (54/47, p=0.022) groups. qEEG showed greater recovery with IH (p<0.001) and significantly less neuronal cortical injury by HDS (IH: 18.9+/-2.5% versus CH: 33.2+/-4.4%, p=0.006). The 1-h post-resuscitation qEEG correlated well with 72-h NDS (p<0.05) and 72-h behavioral subgroup of NDS (p<0.01). No differences in qEEG were noted in the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate but shorter hypothermia compared to CH leads to better functional outcome in rats after 7- and 9-min CA. The beneficial effect of IH was readily detected by neuro-electrophysiological monitoring and histological changes supported the value of this observation.
OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) after cardiac arrest (CA) improves outcomes in a fraction of patients. To enhance the administration of TH, we studied brain electrophysiological monitoring in determining the benefit of early initiation of TH compared to conventional administration in a rat model. METHODS: Using an asphyxial CA model, we compared the benefit of immediate hypothermia (IH, T=33 degrees C, immediately post-resuscitation, maintained 6h) to conventional hypothermia (CH, T=33 degrees C, starting 1h post-resuscitation, maintained 12h) via surface cooling. We tracked quantitative EEG using relative entropy (qEEG) with outcome verification by serial Neurological Deficit Score (NDS) and quantitative brain histopathological damage scoring (HDS). Thirty-two rats were divided into 4 groups based on CH/IH and 7/9-min duration of asphyxial CA. Four sham rats were included for evaluation of the effect of hypothermia on qEEG. RESULTS: The 72-h NDS of the IH group was significantly better than the CH group for both 7-min (74/63; median, IH/CH, p<0.001) and 9-min (54/47, p=0.022) groups. qEEG showed greater recovery with IH (p<0.001) and significantly less neuronal cortical injury by HDS (IH: 18.9+/-2.5% versus CH: 33.2+/-4.4%, p=0.006). The 1-h post-resuscitation qEEG correlated well with 72-h NDS (p<0.05) and 72-h behavioral subgroup of NDS (p<0.01). No differences in qEEG were noted in the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate but shorter hypothermia compared to CH leads to better functional outcome in rats after 7- and 9-min CA. The beneficial effect of IH was readily detected by neuro-electrophysiological monitoring and histological changes supported the value of this observation.
Authors: A Zeiner; M Holzer; F Sterz; W Behringer; W Schörkhuber; M Müllner; M Frass; P Siostrzonek; K Ratheiser; A Kaff; A N Laggner Journal: Stroke Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Stephen A Bernard; Timothy W Gray; Michael D Buist; Bruce M Jones; William Silvester; Geoff Gutteridge; Karen Smith Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mohammad Fazel Bakhsheshi; Errol E Stewart; Joo Ho Tai; Laura Morrison; Lynn Keenliside; Ting-Yim Lee Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Frank W Moler; Faye S Silverstein; Vinay M Nadkarni; Kathleen L Meert; Samir H Shah; Beth Slomine; James Christensen; Richard Holubkov; Kent Page; J Michael Dean Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: David B Seder; Gilles L Fraser; Tracy Robbins; Laurel Libby; Richard R Riker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: James J Menegazzi; Jon C Rittenberger; Brian P Suffoletto; Eric S Logue; David D Salcido; Joshua C Reynolds; Lawrence D Sherman Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 5.262