OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the prognostic implications of high platelet reactivity (HPR) assessed in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients while in their steady-state phase of dual antiplatelet therapy. BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients have increased platelet reactivity compared with nondiabetic patients. Whether HPR assessed in T2DM while in their steady-state phase of dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is unknown. METHODS: Platelet function analyses, which included measures of platelet aggregation and activation, were performed in 173 T2DM patients with coronary artery disease on chronic treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. The HPR was defined as the upper quartile of maximal platelet aggregation (Agg(max)) after 20 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate stimuli. Patients were followed up for 2 years and MACE were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 41 MACE occurred in 34 patients (19.7%) during the 2-year follow-up. The MACE occurred in 15.2%, 12.2%, 12.2%, and 37.7% of patients from the lowest to upper quartile, respectively (p = 0.005). The HPR was the strongest independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 3.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68 to 6.66, p = 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis indicated that a cutoff value of 62% Agg(max) best predicted MACE (37.8% vs. 13.2%, odds ratio 3.96, 95% CI 1.8 to 8.7, p < 0.001). Patients with HPR had up-regulation of multiple platelet signaling pathways (p < 0.0001 for all assays), indicative of a global hyperreactive platelet status. CONCLUSIONS: High platelet reactivity determined in T2DM patients with coronary artery disease while on chronic dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with a higher risk of long-term adverse cardiovascular events, suggesting the need for tailored antithrombotic drug regimens in these high-risk patients.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the prognostic implications of high platelet reactivity (HPR) assessed in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients while in their steady-state phase of dual antiplatelet therapy. BACKGROUND:Type 2 diabetes mellituspatients have increased platelet reactivity compared with nondiabeticpatients. Whether HPR assessed in T2DM while in their steady-state phase of dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is unknown. METHODS: Platelet function analyses, which included measures of platelet aggregation and activation, were performed in 173 T2DM patients with coronary artery disease on chronic treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. The HPR was defined as the upper quartile of maximal platelet aggregation (Agg(max)) after 20 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate stimuli. Patients were followed up for 2 years and MACE were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 41 MACE occurred in 34 patients (19.7%) during the 2-year follow-up. The MACE occurred in 15.2%, 12.2%, 12.2%, and 37.7% of patients from the lowest to upper quartile, respectively (p = 0.005). The HPR was the strongest independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 3.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68 to 6.66, p = 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis indicated that a cutoff value of 62% Agg(max) best predicted MACE (37.8% vs. 13.2%, odds ratio 3.96, 95% CI 1.8 to 8.7, p < 0.001). Patients with HPR had up-regulation of multiple platelet signaling pathways (p < 0.0001 for all assays), indicative of a global hyperreactive platelet status. CONCLUSIONS: High platelet reactivity determined in T2DM patients with coronary artery disease while on chronic dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with a higher risk of long-term adverse cardiovascular events, suggesting the need for tailored antithrombotic drug regimens in these high-risk patients.
Authors: M T Nieman; F Burke; M Warnock; Y Zhou; J Sweigart; A Chen; D Ricketts; B R Lucchesi; Z Chen; E Di Cera; J Hilfinger; J S Kim; H I Mosberg; A H Schmaier Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Miklos Z Molnar; Elani Streja; Csaba P Kovesdy; Matthew J Budoff; Allen R Nissenson; Mahesh Krishnan; Stefan D Anker; Keith C Norris; Gregg C Fonarow; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: David Fitchett; John Eikelboom; Stephen Fremes; David Mazer; Steve Singh; Bindu Bittira; Stephanie Brister; John J Graham; Milan Gupta; Keyvan Karkouti; Agnes Lee; Michael Love; Rod McArthur; Mark Peterson; Subodh Verma; Terrence M Yau Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.223