Literature DB >> 17936018

Realistic simulations of neuronal activity: a contribution to the debate on direct detection of neuronal currents by MRI.

A M Cassarà1, G E Hagberg, M Bianciardi, M Migliore, B Maraviglia.   

Abstract

Many efforts have been done in order to preview the properties of the magnetic resonance (MR) signals produced by the neuronal currents using simulations. In this paper, starting with a detailed calculation of the magnetic field produced by the neuronal currents propagating over single hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons placed inside a cubic MR voxel of length 1.2 mm, we proceeded on the estimation of the phase and magnitude MR signals. We then extended the results to layers of parallel and synchronous similar neurons and to ensembles of layers, considering different echo times, voxel volumes and neuronal densities. The descriptions of the neurons and of their electrical activity took into account the real neuronal morphologies and the physiology of the neuronal events. Our results concern: (a) the expected time course of the MR signals produced by the neuronal currents in the brain, based on physiological and anatomical properties; (b) the different contributions of post-synaptic potentials and of action potentials to the MR signals; (c) the estimation of the equivalent current dipole and the influence of its orientation with respect to the external magnetic field on the observable MR signal variations; (d) the size of the estimated neuronal current induced phase and magnitude MR signal changes with respect to the echo time, voxel-size and neuronal density. The inclusion of realistic neuronal properties into the simulation introduces new information that can be helpful for the design of MR sequences for the direct detection of neuronal current effects and the testing of bio-electromagnetic models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17936018     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of oscillating electrical currents.

Authors:  Nicholas W Halpern-Manners; Vikram S Bajaj; Thomas Z Teisseyre; Alexander Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is it possible to detect dendrite currents using presently available magnetic resonance imaging techniques?

Authors:  William I Jay; Ranjith S Wijesinghe; Brain D Dolasinski; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Direct detection of a single evoked action potential with MRS in Lumbricus terrestris.

Authors:  Alexander J Poplawsky; Raymond Dingledine; Xiaoping P Hu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Can high-field MREIT be used to directly detect neural activity? Theoretical considerations.

Authors:  R J Sadleir; S C Grant; E J Woo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Direct detection of neural activity in vitro using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Fanrui Fu; Corey Falgas; Stephen Holland; May Boggess; Samuel C Grant; Eung Je Woo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of ionic currents in solution: the effect of magnetohydrodynamic flow.

Authors:  Mukund Balasubramanian; Robert V Mulkern; William M Wells; Padmavathi Sundaram; Darren B Orbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  On multiple alternating steady states induced by periodic spin phase perturbation waveforms.

Authors:  Giedrius T Buračas; Youngkyoo Jung; Jongho Lee; Richard B Buxton; Eric C Wong; Thomas T Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Modeling the effect of dendritic input location on MEG and EEG source dipoles.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Christopher Wreh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Detection of peripheral nerve and skeletal muscle action currents using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ranjith S Wijesinghe; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Physiologically evoked neuronal current MRI in a bloodless turtle brain: detectable or not?

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Huo Lu; Hanbing Lu; David Senseman; Keith Worsley; Yihong Yang; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.