BACKGROUND: Recent evidence that some DNA-repair functions are haploinsufficient adds weight to the notion that variants in DNA-repair genes constitute part of the spectrum of defects contributing to cancer risk. X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 gene (XRCC1) is involved in base excision repair (BER) pathway, acting on spontaneous and induced DNA damage. This gene encodes for a scaffolding protein that brings together different proteins involved in the repair process. Among the non-synonymous polymorphisms in XRCC1 gene, codons 194 and 399 lead to amino acid changes at evolutionary conserved regions, and seem to alter the efficiency of the protein. METHODS: A hospital based case-control study was carried out in a Caucasian Portuguese population (241 cancer patients and 457 controls matched for sex and age) in order to evaluate the potential modifying role of the XRCC1 polymorphisms on the individual susceptibility to breast cancer. RESULTS: Our data did not reveal a positive association between the polymorphisms individually and breast cancer, or with the combination of the different genotypic associations. However, after stratification to the menopausal status, it was observed that carriers of the Gln/Gln genotype of the R399Q polymorphism with a menopausal age above 55 years are at increased risk for breast cancer (OR=4.074; CI=1.562-10.626; P=0.004). Concerning the Arg194Trp polymorphism, after stratification by menopausal status, it was observed that heterozygous individuals (Arg/Trp) with a menopausal age between 45 and 54 are at increased risk for breast cancer (adjusted OR=1.964; CI=1.174-3.288; P=0.01) as well as carriers of the variant allele (Arg/Trp+Trp/Trp) (adjusted OR=1.932; CI=1.156-3.228; P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that menopausal age together with Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln XRCC1 gene polymorphisms might be involved in individual susceptibility to breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence that some DNA-repair functions are haploinsufficient adds weight to the notion that variants in DNA-repair genes constitute part of the spectrum of defects contributing to cancer risk. X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 gene (XRCC1) is involved in base excision repair (BER) pathway, acting on spontaneous and induced DNA damage. This gene encodes for a scaffolding protein that brings together different proteins involved in the repair process. Among the non-synonymous polymorphisms in XRCC1 gene, codons 194 and 399 lead to amino acid changes at evolutionary conserved regions, and seem to alter the efficiency of the protein. METHODS: A hospital based case-control study was carried out in a Caucasian Portuguese population (241 cancerpatients and 457 controls matched for sex and age) in order to evaluate the potential modifying role of the XRCC1 polymorphisms on the individual susceptibility to breast cancer. RESULTS: Our data did not reveal a positive association between the polymorphisms individually and breast cancer, or with the combination of the different genotypic associations. However, after stratification to the menopausal status, it was observed that carriers of the Gln/Gln genotype of the R399Q polymorphism with a menopausal age above 55 years are at increased risk for breast cancer (OR=4.074; CI=1.562-10.626; P=0.004). Concerning the Arg194Trp polymorphism, after stratification by menopausal status, it was observed that heterozygous individuals (Arg/Trp) with a menopausal age between 45 and 54 are at increased risk for breast cancer (adjusted OR=1.964; CI=1.174-3.288; P=0.01) as well as carriers of the variant allele (Arg/Trp+Trp/Trp) (adjusted OR=1.932; CI=1.156-3.228; P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that menopausal age together with Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln XRCC1 gene polymorphisms might be involved in individual susceptibility to breast cancer.
Authors: Sinan Trabulus; Gulgun S Guven; Mehmet R Altiparmak; Bahadir Batar; Ozlem Tun; Ayse S Yalin; Aydin Tunckale; Mehmet Guven Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Tasha R Smith; Wen Liu-Mares; Beth O Van Emburgh; Edward A Levine; Glenn O Allen; Jeff W Hill; Isildinha M Reis; Laura A Kresty; Mark D Pegram; Mark S Miller; Jennifer J Hu Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Michelle R Roberts; Peter G Shields; Christine B Ambrosone; Jing Nie; Catalin Marian; Shiva S Krishnan; David S Goerlitz; Ramakrishna Modali; Michael Seddon; Teresa Lehman; Kandace L Amend; Maurizio Trevisan; Stephen B Edge; Jo L Freudenheim Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Teresa Warchoł; Adriana Mostowska; Margarita Lianeri; Jan K Lącki; Paweł P Jagodziński Journal: DNA Cell Biol Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 3.311
Authors: Magdalena M Michalska; Dariusz Samulak; Hanna Romanowicz; Jan Bieńkiewicz; Maciej Sobkowski; Krzysztof Ciesielski; Beata Smolarz Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2015-06-30
Authors: João Conde; Susana N Silva; Ana P Azevedo; Valdemar Teixeira; Julieta Esperança Pina; José Rueff; Jorge F Gaspar Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 4.430