Literature DB >> 17935651

Changing the process of care and practice in acute asthma in the emergency department: experience with an asthma care map in a regional hospital.

Duncan Mackey1, Marlene Myles, Carol H Spooner, Harris Lari, Leslie Tyler, Sandra Blitz, Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan, Brian H Rowe.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the frequency of acute asthma in the emergency department (ED) and the availability of guidelines, significant practice variation exists. Asthma care maps (ACMs) may standardize treatment. This study examined the use of an ACM to determine its effects on patient management in a regional hospital.
METHODS: Patients aged 2 to 65 years who presented to the ED with a primary diagnosis of acute asthma were enrolled in a prospective study that took place 5 months before (pre) and 5 months after (post) ACM implementation. Research assistants using a standardized questionnaire abstracted data through direct patient interviews and then followed up at 2 weeks with a standardized telephone interview.
RESULTS: Overall, 71 pre patients and 70 post patients were enrolled. Characteristics in both groups were similar. The care map was used in 100% of the cases during the post period. The mean length of stay in the ED for the pre, compared with the post period, was similar (2 h 14 min v. 2 h 25 min; p = 0.60), as were admission rates (11% v. 9%; p = 0.59). Systemic corticosteroid use was similar (62% v. 57%; p = 0.56); however, the total number of beta-agonists (2 v. 4 treatments; p = 0.002) and anticholinergics (1 v. 2 treatments; p < 0.001) administered in the ED was higher during the post period. Prescriptions for oral (73% v. 60%; p = 0.15) and inhaled (78% v. 78%; p = 0.98) corticosteroids at discharge remained the same. Relapse rates at follow-up were unchanged (29% v. 34%; p = 0.52).
CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that implementation of an ACM increased acute bronchodilator use; however, prescribing preventive medications did not increase. Further research is required to evaluate other strategies to improve asthma care by emergency physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17935651     DOI: 10.1017/s148180350001530x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


  4 in total

Review 1.  Management of acute asthma in adults in the emergency department: nonventilatory management.

Authors:  Rick Hodder; M Diane Lougheed; Brian H Rowe; J Mark FitzGerald; Alan G Kaplan; R Andrew McIvor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Multicenter analysis of quality indicators for children treated in the emergency department for asthma.

Authors:  Marion R Sills; Adit A Ginde; Sunday Clark; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Can an evidence-based guideline reminder card improve asthma management in the emergency department?

Authors:  Teresa To; Chengning Wang; Sharon D Dell; Bonnie Fleming-Carroll; Patricia Parkin; Dennis Scolnik; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.415

4.  A systematic review of the implementation and impact of asthma protocols.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Elizabeth M Borycki; Kou-Wei Chiu; Kevin B Johnson; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.