Literature DB >> 17934749

In vivo monosomy 3 detection of posterior uveal melanoma: 3-year follow-up.

Edoardo Midena1, Laura Bonaldi, Raffaele Parrozzani, Pietro P Radin, Barbara Boccassini, Stela Vujosevic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monosomy 3 is a highly specific marker for poor prognosis in posterior uveal melanoma. Unfortunately, cytogenetic prognostication is limited to enucleated eyes or resected tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate mid-term natural history and safety of in vivo detection of chromosome 3 status in posterior uveal melanomas undergoing plaque brachytherapy.
METHODS: A 25-gauge transscleral fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was performed in 32 eyes affected by posterior uveal melanoma undergoing plaque brachytherapy, just before applying the radioactive plaque. Sampled material underwent fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with centromeric probes for chromosome 3. All patients had a follow-up of at least 36 months.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 47.1 +/- 8.5 months. Mean largest basal diameter and mean thickness of the tumors were 12.5 +/- 2.7 mm and 8 +/- 2.3 mm respectively. FNAB yielded sufficient material in 26 of 32 cases (81.2%). Adequacy of the sample ranged from 91.1% (ciliary body tumors) to 76.8% (choroidal tumors). Seventeen cases had monosomy 3 (65.3%). No correlation was found between monosomy 3 and tumor dimensions or location (ciliary body vs choroidal tumors). No early and mid-term local complications were documented. Seven patients (21.8%) died during follow-up: five (15.6%) of them died due to metastatic disease (all had monosomy 3 tumors).
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior uveal melanomas may be adequately and safely sampled, by intra-operative transscleral FNAB, to detect in vivo monosomy 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17934749     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-007-0692-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  33 in total

1.  Identification of chromosomes 3, 6, and 8 aberrations in uveal melanoma by microsatellite analysis in comparison to comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  F Tschentscher; G Prescher; M Zeschnigk; B Horsthemke; D R Lohmann
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2000-10-01

2.  Nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities in primary uveal melanoma.

Authors:  G Prescher; N Bornfeld; R Becher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Abnormalities of chromosomes 3 and 8 in posterior uveal melanoma correlate with prognosis.

Authors:  K Sisley; I G Rennie; M A Parsons; R Jacques; D W Hammond; S M Bell; A M Potter; R C Rees
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  In vivo detection of monosomy 3 in eyes with medium-sized uveal melanoma using transscleral fine needle aspiration biopsy.

Authors:  E Midena; L Bonaldi; R Parrozzani; E Tebaldi; B Boccassini; S Vujosevic
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Gene expression profiling in uveal melanoma reveals two molecular classes and predicts metastatic death.

Authors:  Michael D Onken; Lori A Worley; Justis P Ehlers; J William Harbour
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Detection of genetic prognostic markers in uveal melanoma biopsies using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Nicole C Naus; Anette C A Verhoeven; Ellen van Drunen; Rosalyn Slater; Cornelia M Mooy; Dion A Paridaens; Grégorius P M Luyten; Annelies de Klein
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Non-random abnormalities of chromosomes 3, 6, and 8 associated with posterior uveal melanoma.

Authors:  K Sisley; D W Cottam; I G Rennie; M A Parsons; A M Potter; C W Potter; R C Rees
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Dissecting karyotypic patterns in malignant melanomas: temporal clustering of losses and gains in melanoma karyotypic evolution.

Authors:  Mattias Höglund; David Gisselsson; Gunnar B Hansen; Valerie A White; Torbjörn Säll; Felix Mitelman; Douglas Horsman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 3 detected with single nucleotide polymorphisms is superior to monosomy 3 for predicting metastasis in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Michael D Onken; Lori A Worley; Erica Person; Devron H Char; Anne M Bowcock; J William Harbour
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Microarray comparative genomic hybridisation analysis of intraocular uveal melanomas identifies distinctive imbalances associated with loss of chromosome 3.

Authors:  S Hughes; B E Damato; I Giddings; P S Hiscott; J Humphreys; R S Houlston
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Yield, Techniques, and Complications of Transvitreal and Transscleral Biopsies in Small Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Ryan Sangwoo Kim; Patricia Chevez-Barrios; Mukul Divatia; Maria Eugenia Bretana; Bin Teh; Amy Claire Schefler
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Chromosome 3 status in uveal melanoma: a comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism array.

Authors:  Arun D Singh; Mary E Aronow; Yang Sun; Gurkan Bebek; Yogen Saunthararajah; Lynn R Schoenfield; Charles V Biscotti; Raymond R Tubbs; Pierre L Triozzi; Charis Eng
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Expression of the SST receptor 2 in uveal melanoma is not a prognostic marker.

Authors:  Mariam Kouch-el Filali; Emine Kilic; Marleen Melis; Annelies de Klein; Marion de Jong; Gregorius P M Luyten
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Sara Valpione; Justin C Moser; Raffaele Parrozzani; Marco Bazzi; Aaron S Mansfield; Simone Mocellin; Jacopo Pigozzo; Edoardo Midena; Svetomir N Markovic; Camillo Aliberti; Luca G Campana; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Brachytherapy for patients with uveal melanoma: historical perspectives and future treatment directions.

Authors:  Beatrice Y Brewington; Yusra F Shao; Fredrick H Davidorf; Colleen M Cebulla
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-17

6.  Sufficiency of FNAB aspirates of posterior uveal melanoma for cytologic versus GEP classification in 159 patients, and relative prognostic significance of these classifications.

Authors:  Zelia M Correa; James J Augsburger
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 3.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.