Literature DB >> 17933557

EST sequencing of Onychophora and phylogenomic analysis of Metazoa.

Falko Roeding1, Silke Hagner-Holler, Hilke Ruhberg, Ingo Ebersberger, Arndt von Haeseler, Michael Kube, Richard Reinhardt, Thorsten Burmester.   

Abstract

Onychophora (velvet worms) represent a small animal taxon considered to be related to Euarthropoda. We have obtained 1873 5' cDNA sequences (expressed sequence tags, ESTs) from the velvet worm Epiperipatus sp., which were assembled into 833 contigs. BLAST similarity searches revealed that 51.9% of the contigs had matches in the protein databases with expectation values lower than 10(-4). Most ESTs had the best hit with proteins from either Chordata or Arthropoda (approximately 40% respectively). The ESTs included sequences of 27 ribosomal proteins. The orthologous sequences from 28 other species of a broad range of phyla were obtained from the databases, including other EST projects. A concatenated amino acid alignment comprising 5021 positions was constructed, which covers 4259 positions when problematic regions were removed. Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods place Epiperipatus within the monophyletic Ecdysozoa (Onychophora, Arthropoda, Tardigrada and Nematoda), but its exact relation to the Euarthropoda remained unresolved. The "Articulata" concept was not supported. Tardigrada and Nematoda formed a well-supported monophylum, suggesting that Tardigrada are actually Cycloneuralia. In agreement with previous studies, we have demonstrated that random sequencing of cDNAs results in sequence information suitable for phylogenomic approaches to resolve metazoan relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17933557     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  20 in total

1.  Harnessing disorder: onychophorans use highly unstructured proteins, not silks, for prey capture.

Authors:  Victoria S Haritos; Ajay Niranjane; Sarah Weisman; Holly E Trueman; Alagacone Sriskantha; Tara D Sutherland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Structural cuticular proteins from arthropods: annotation, nomenclature, and sequence characteristics in the genomics era.

Authors:  Judith H Willis
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.714

3.  On velvet worms and caterpillars: science, fiction, or science fiction?

Authors:  Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  MicroRNAs and phylogenomics resolve the relationships of Tardigrada and suggest that velvet worms are the sister group of Arthropoda.

Authors:  Lahcen I Campbell; Omar Rota-Stabelli; Gregory D Edgecombe; Trevor Marchioro; Stuart J Longhorn; Maximilian J Telford; Hervé Philippe; Lorena Rebecchi; Kevin J Peterson; Davide Pisani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Phylogeny and mitochondrial gene order variation in Lophotrochozoa in the light of new mitogenomic data from Nemertea.

Authors:  Lars Podsiadlowski; Anke Braband; Torsten H Struck; Jörn von Döhren; Thomas Bartolomaeus
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Integrating multi-origin expression data improves the resolution of deep phylogeny of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii).

Authors:  Ming Zou; Baocheng Guo; Wenjing Tao; Gloria Arratia; Shunping He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Identification, distribution and molecular evolution of the pacifastin gene family in Metazoa.

Authors:  Bert Breugelmans; Gert Simonet; Vincent van Hoef; Sofie Van Soest; Jozef Vanden Broeck
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  HaMStR: profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs.

Authors:  Ingo Ebersberger; Sascha Strauss; Arndt von Haeseler
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships.

Authors:  Björn M von Reumont; Karen Meusemann; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Emiliano Dell'Ampio; Vivek Gowri-Shankar; Daniela Bartel; Sabrina Simon; Harald O Letsch; Roman R Stocsits; Yun-xia Luan; Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Günther Pass; Heike Hadrys; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The impact of paralogy on phylogenomic studies - a case study on annelid relationships.

Authors:  Torsten H Struck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.