Literature DB >> 17933190

Biological movement variability during the sprint start: performance enhancement or hindrance?

Elizabeth J Bradshaw1, Peter S Maulder, Justin W L Keogh.   

Abstract

In the current study, we quantified biological movement variability on the start and early acceleration phase of sprinting. Ten male athletes aged 17-23 years (100-m personal best: 10.87 +/- 0.36s) performed four 10-m sprints. Two 250-Hz cameras recorded the sagittal plane action to obtain the two-dimensional kinematics of the block start and initial strides from subsequent manually digitized APAS motion analysis. Infra-red timing lights (80Hz) were used to measure the 10-m sprinting times. The coefficient of variation (CV%) calculation was adjusted to separate biological movement variability (BCV%) from estimates of variability induced by technological error (SEM%) for each individual sprinter and measure. Pearson's product-moment correlation and linear regression analysis were used to establish relationships between measures of BCV% and 10-m sprint start performance (best 10-m time) or 10-m sprint start performance consistency (10-m time BCV%) using SPSS version 12.0. Measurement error markedly inflated traditional measures of movement variability (CV%) by up to 72%. Variability in task outcome measures was considerably lower than that observed in joint rotation velocities. Consistent generation of high horizontal velocity out of the blocks led to more stable and faster starting strides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17933190     DOI: 10.1080/14763140701489660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  13 in total

1.  Kinematics of the typical beach flags start for young adult sprinters.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; William M Vickery; Xanne A K Janse de Jonge
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Timing of Gun Fire Influences Sprinters' Multiple Joint Reaction Times of Whole Body in Block Start.

Authors:  Mitsuo Otsuka; Toshiyuki Kurihara; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-18

3.  An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; Samuel J Callaghan; Matthew R Moreno; Fabrice G Risso; Tricia M Liu; Alyssa A Stage; Samantha A Birmingham-Babauta; John J Stokes; Dominic V Giuliano; Adrina Lazar; DeShaun L Davis; Ashley J Orjalo
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-24

4.  Anthropometry-driven block setting improves starting block performance in sprinters.

Authors:  Valentina Cavedon; Marco Sandri; Mariola Pirlo; Nicola Petrone; Carlo Zancanaro; Chiara Milanese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The Biomechanics of the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Neil Edward Bezodis; Steffen Willwacher; Aki Ilkka Tapio Salo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Constraints influencing sports wheelchair propulsion performance and injury risk.

Authors:  Emily Churton; Justin Wl Keogh
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-28

7.  Effect of a Wide Stance on Block Start Performance in Sprint Running.

Authors:  Mitsuo Otsuka; Toshiyuki Kurihara; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Kinematics that differentiate the beach flags start between elite and non-elite sprinters.

Authors:  R G Lockie; W M Vickery
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.806

9.  The effects of three different rear knee angles on kinematics in the sprint start.

Authors:  C Milanese; M Bertucco; C Zancanaro
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.806

10.  Interaction Between Leg Muscle Performance and Sprint Acceleration Kinematics.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; Farzad Jalilvand; Samuel J Callaghan; Matthew D Jeffriess; Aron J Murphy
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.