Literature DB >> 17932898

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of the polymer-based 17-beta estradiol-eluting stent for treatment of native coronary artery lesions: six-month results of the ETHOS I trial.

Alexandre Abizaid1, Aurea J Chaves, Martin B Leon, Karl Hauptmann, Roxana Mehran, Alexandra J Lansky, William Baumbach, Hari Shankar, Ralf Muller, Fausto Feres, Amanda G M R Sousa, J Eduardo Sousa, Eberhard Grube.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The ETHOS I trial was the first in-human experience evaluating the safety and efficacy of two different release formulations of the 17-beta estradiol-eluting R-Stent versus uncoated control stents for the treatment of patients with single de novo native coronary lesions.
BACKGROUND: Estrogens were reported to inhibit neointimal proliferation and to accelerate endothelial regeneration after coronary angioplasty and thus could be an ideal compound to deliver on a stent for the purpose of reducing in-stent restenosis.
METHODS: Ninety-five patients were randomized to receive a slow-release (n = 32) or the moderate release (n = 31) formulations or the bare metal stent (n = 32). The primary end point was the 6-month percent in-stent volume obstruction by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
RESULTS: Diabetes was present in 29.5% of patients; the mean reference vessel diameter was 2.90 mm; and the mean lesion length was 13.5 mm. Primary endpoint, 6-month percent in-stent volume obstruction by IVUS, did not differ significantly between the 3 groups (31% +/- 14%, 33% +/- 11%, and 31% +/- 14%, P = 0.83). Secondary endpoints also did not differ significantly between the groups including 6-month rates of in-lesion binary angiographic restenosis (13.3%, 14.3%, and 12.5%, P = 0.98), in-stent late loss (0.82 +/- 0.49 mm, 0.86 +/- 0.53 mm, and 0.84 +/- 0.46 mm, P = 0.97), target lesion revascularization (12.5%, 6.9%, and 6.5%, P = 0.64), and major adverse cardiac events (18.8%, 10.3%, and 6.5%, P = 0.31).
CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-man randomized trial, the 17-beta estradiol-eluting R-Stent, in either slow- or moderate-release formulations, was well-tolerated, but showed no benefit for treatment of coronary lesions when compared to controls. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932898     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  Trait anger, hostility, serum homocysteine, and recurrent cardiac events after percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Eun Kyeung Song; Youn-Jung Son; Terry A Lennie
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 2.  Estrogen-eluting stents.

Authors:  Sung Kee Ryu; Ehtisham Mahmud; Sotirios Tsimikas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Human recombinant activated protein C-coated stent for the prevention of restenosis in porcine coronary arteries.

Authors:  Dominika Lukovic; Noemi Nyolczas; Rayyan Hemetsberger; Imre J Pavo; Aniko Pósa; Boris Behnisch; Gerhard Horak; Katrin Zlabinger; Mariann Gyöngyösi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Cardiovascular stents: overview, evolution, and next generation.

Authors:  Setareh Borhani; Shadi Hassanajili; Seyed Hossein Ahmadi Tafti; Shahram Rabbani
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-09-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.