Literature DB >> 17932704

Measuring cognitive change in older adults. Do reliable change indices of the SIDAM predict dementia?

A Hensel1, M C Angermeyer, S G Riedel-Heller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In persons free of dementia, accelerated cognitive decline might be an indicator of pathological impairment and a potential predictor of future dementia. However, the reliable detection of cognitive decline is a challenging task in some cases. Changes in psychometric test scores do not necessarily result from 'true' clinical change and may result from factors like measurement error and regression to the mean. Reliable Change Indices (RCI) facilitate the interpretation of changes in psychometric test scores. However, it is unknown whether RCI predict future dementia in persons who are presently free of dementia. AIM: To examine for a widely used screening instrument for cognitive impairment and dementia (SIDAM) whether RCI methods contribute to the prediction of dementia diagnosis in older adults who are presently free of dementia.
METHODS: A sample of 554 elderly individuals aged 75 and over who participated in the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA 75+) and had no diagnosis of dementia at the first two visits. Participants have been tested with the test part of the SIDAM at maximal six visits with 1.5 year intervals. In all participants, RCI for change in SIDAM score (Time 1 to Time 2) have been computed. The main outcome measure was the diagnosis of dementia.
RESULTS: ROC analyses showed that RCI were significant predictors of future dementia. Participants who deteriorated in SIDAM score -4 points or more had a three-fold increased risk of developing dementia (odds ratio 2.71, CI 1.6 to 4.6). However, RCI were not independent predictors of dementia in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: RCI may support the early diagnosis of dementia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932704     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-007-0549-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  22 in total

1.  Determining reliable cognitive change after epilepsy surgery: development of reliable change indices and standardized regression-based change norms for the WMS-III and WAIS-III.

Authors:  Roy Martin; Stephen Sawrie; Frank Gilliam; Melissa Mackey; Edward Faught; Robert Knowlton; Ruben Kuzniekcy
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  Monitoring cognitive changes: psychometric properties of six cognitive tests.

Authors:  Chris M Bird; Kyriaki Papadopoulou; Paola Ricciardelli; Martin N Rossor; Lisa Cipolotti
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-06

3.  Normative data for determining significance of test-retest differences on eight common neuropsychological instruments.

Authors:  Andrew J Levine; Eric N Miller; James T Becker; Ola A Selnes; Bruce A Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the "normal" elderly.

Authors:  Ronald F Zec; Stephen J Markwell; Nicole R Burkett; Deb L Larsen
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-16

6.  A change point model for estimating the onset of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  C B Hall; R B Lipton; M Sliwinski; W F Stewart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000 Jun 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Test-retest reliable coefficients and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS.

Authors:  Tom N Tombaugh
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  Testing normal older people three or four times at 1- to 2-year intervals: defining normal variance.

Authors:  R J Ivnik; G E Smith; J A Lucas; R C Petersen; B F Boeve; E Kokmen; E G Tangalos
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Detecting change: A comparison of three neuropsychological methods, using normal and clinical samples.

Authors:  R K Heaton; N Temkin; S Dikmen; N Avitable; M J Taylor; T D Marcotte; I Grant
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.813

10.  Measuring cognitive change in older adults: reliable change indices for the SIDAM.

Authors:  Anke Hensel; Matthias C Angermeyer; Michael Zaudig; Steffi G Riedel-Heller
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Dementia risk prediction in the population: are screening models accurate?

Authors:  Blossom C M Stephan; Tobias Kurth; Fiona E Matthews; Carol Brayne; Carole Dufouil
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Assessing individual-level change in dementia research: a review of methodologies.

Authors:  Aja Louise Murray; Marlena Vollmer; Ian J Deary; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Tom Booth
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.982

3.  Morbidity outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Andreas Auensen; Amjad Iqbal Hussain; Bjørn Bendz; Lars Aaberge; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Marte Meyer Walle-Hansen; Jorun Bye; Johanna Andreassen; Jan Otto Beitnes; Kjell Arne Rein; Kjell Ingar Pettersen; Lars Gullestad
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  CoGNIT Automated Tablet Computer Cognitive Testing in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Anders Behrens; Johan Sanmartin Berglund; Peter Anderberg
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-03-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.