Literature DB >> 17932630

[Structures and volume standards in colon and rectal surgery].

U J Roblick1, R Keller, P Hildebrand, R Czymek, H-P Bruch.   

Abstract

Applying the principle "practice makes perfect" to interventional medicine would mean that surgeons and departments with high treatment volumes for special procedures should have better results than low-volume institutions. In the last three decades several studies were published dealing with the association of therapy volume and treatment quality, e.g. in oncologic and vascular surgery as well as interventional cardiology. Concerning colorectal cancer it has been shown that an individual surgeon's case load is important but by far not the only therapy-associated prognostic factor. For example interdisciplinarity and multimodality including adequate pathological classification are no less important. For continual improvement of clinical outcome, quality management and control will grow in importance. Thus, it is necessary to develop structures and to specify standards for colorectal surgery. Based on the data available it is not yet possible to define minimum volumes for colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932630     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1423-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  11 in total

Review 1.  Role of the surgeon as a variable in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  P Hermanek; P J Hermanek
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-12

2.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G A Porter; C L Soskolne; W W Yakimets; S C Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Influence of volume of work on the outcome of treatment for patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J M Parry; S Collins; J Mathers; N A Scott; C B Woodman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival.

Authors:  C S McArdle; D Hole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-22

5.  Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  D Schrag; L D Cramer; P B Bach; A M Cohen; J L Warren; C B Begg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population.

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; N Baxter; A Balshem; E Ross; Z Cohen; R McLeod; P Engstrom; E Sigurdson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  ["Colon-/rectal carcinoma" prospective studies as comprehensive surgical quality assurance].

Authors:  F Marusch; A Koch; U Schmidt; R Zippel; S Geissler; M Pross; A Roessner; F Köckerling; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Physician and hospital factors associated with mortality of surgical patients.

Authors:  J V Kelly; F J Hellinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Does practice make perfect? Part I: The relation between hospital volume and outcomes for selected diagnostic categories.

Authors:  A B Flood; W R Scott; W Ewy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Comparison of individual surgeon's performance. Risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system.

Authors:  P M Sagar; M N Hartley; J MacFie; B A Taylor; G P Copeland
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.