OBJECTIVE: To compare performance of the newest vital sign (NVS) with existing literacy measures. METHODS: We administered the NVS and REALM to 129 patients, and NVS and S-TOFHLA to 119 patients all in public clinics. RESULTS: The NVS demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting limited literacy and moderate specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] curve 0.71-0.73). The NVS was less effective than the S-TOFHLA for predicting health outcomes. CONCLUSION: The NVS is able to identify patients with limited literacy skills, but may misclassify those with adequate literacy according to the REALM and S-TOFHLA. NVS scores were not associated with health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To compare performance of the newest vital sign (NVS) with existing literacy measures. METHODS: We administered the NVS and REALM to 129 patients, and NVS and S-TOFHLA to 119 patients all in public clinics. RESULTS: The NVS demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting limited literacy and moderate specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] curve 0.71-0.73). The NVS was less effective than the S-TOFHLA for predicting health outcomes. CONCLUSION: The NVS is able to identify patients with limited literacy skills, but may misclassify those with adequate literacy according to the REALM and S-TOFHLA. NVS scores were not associated with health outcomes.
Authors: Andrea L Metti; Jane A Cauley; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Tamara B Harris; Caterina Rosano; Jeff D Williamson; Kristine Yaffe Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2013 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Margaret E Samuels-Kalow; Karin V Rhodes; Mira Henien; Emily Hardy; Thomas Moore; Felicia Wong; Carlos A Camargo; Caroline T Rizzo; Cynthia Mollen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Joule J Li; Sarah L Appleton; Gary A Wittert; Andrew Vakulin; R Douglas McEvoy; Nick A Antic; Robert J Adams Journal: Sleep Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849