Literature DB >> 17929528

Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.

Miguel Peñarrocha1, Carolina Larrazábal, José Balaguer, Concha Serrano, Javier Silvestre, José-Vicente Bagán.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of endosseous implants in the prosthetic restoration of edentulous patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) may provide improved outcomes when compared with traditional prosthetic methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of placing endosseous implants in patients with RDEB and to compare the treatment outcomes of fixed and removable implant-supported restorations in the edentulous maxilla or mandible with the main emphasis on patient response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with RDEB were treated with implants. All patients were completely edentulous in either the maxilla or mandible and had marked oral involvement, with alterations in the soft and hard tissues in all cases. Three patients were treated with fixed, screw-retained implant-supported prostheses, and 3 were treated with removable implant-supported prostheses. Six months after prosthetic restoration, patients were given a questionnaire to assess their psychologic well-being and satisfaction with the implant-supported restoration marked on a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: A total of 38 dental implants (21 maxillary, 17 mandibular) were placed in 6 patients. The implant success rate was 97.9%. The average follow-up from implant placement was 5.5 years (range, 1 to 9). The fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses were associated with improvements in comfort and retention, function, esthetics and appearance, taste, speech, and self-esteem. The level of satisfaction was slightly higher in patients with a fixed prosthesis.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that endosseous implants can be successfully placed and provide support for prostheses in patients with RDEB. Patients with fixed prostheses and overdentures were satisfied with their implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla and mandible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  4 in total

Review 1.  Implant rehabilitation in patients with oral lichen planus: an overview.

Authors:  Massimo Petruzzi; Michele De Benedittis; Roberto Cortelazzi; Lucio Milillo; Alberta Lucchese; Rosario Serpico; Felice Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Dental implants in patients affected by systemic diseases.

Authors:  N Donos; E Calciolari
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Clinical practice guidelines: Oral health care for children and adults living with epidermolysis bullosa.

Authors:  Susanne Krämer; James Lucas; Francisca Gamboa; Miguel Peñarrocha Diago; David Peñarrocha Oltra; Marcelo Guzmán-Letelier; Sanchit Paul; Gustavo Molina; Lorena Sepúlveda; Ignacio Araya; Rubén Soto; Carolina Arriagada; Anne W Lucky; Jemima E Mellerio; Roger Cornwall; Fatimah Alsayer; Reinhard Schilke; Mark Adam Antal; Fernanda Castrillón; Camila Paredes; Maria Concepción Serrano; Victoria Clark
Journal:  Spec Care Dentist       Date:  2020-11

4.  Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Ricardo Santiago Gomez
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-10-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.