Literature DB >> 17929517

The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.

Konstantinos Michalakis1, Argiris L Pissiotis, Kiho Kang, Hiroshi Hirayama, Pavlos D Garefis, Haralambos Petridis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of thermal cycling and surface roughness of metal implant abutments and the intaglio surface of the copings on the retentive properties of 4 provisional luting agents commonly used in the cementation of implant-retained fixed partial dentures (FPDs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 2-unit implant-retained FPD and a 4-unit implant-retained FPD were fabricated using gold-palladium alloy. The abutments used were 5 mm in height. The FPDs were cemented with 4 commonly used provisional luting agents and thermocycled for 700 cycles from 5 degrees C to 36 degrees C to 55 degrees C and were then subjected to tensile strength testing. After thermal cycling, the intaglio surfaces of the same FPDs and the abutments were air-abraded with 50 microm Al2O3 particles. FPDs were cemented using the same provisional cements, and after 24 hours of storage in 100% humidity, tensile strength tests were performed. Descriptive statistics, 2-way analysis of variance, Friedman's 2-way ANOVA, and Tukey's HSD test (alpha = .05) were performed.
RESULTS: Both thermal cycling and air abrasion had a significant effect (P < .001) on the retentive values of all cements tested. A noneugenol provisional cement (Nogenol) exhibited the lowest mean retentive value after both thermal cycling and air abrasion for both the 2- and 4-unit FPD models. The urethane resin provisional cement (Improv) exhibited the highest mean retentive strength for both the 2- and 4-unit FPDs after thermal cycling and air abrasion treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: Thermal cycling had a detrimental effect on the retentive properties of all cements tested. Air abrasion significantly improved the cement failure loads of the provisional luting agents used in the study and seems to be an effective way of increasing the retention of implant-retained FPDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of the effect of implant abutment surface modifications on retention of implant-supported restoration with a polymer based cement.

Authors:  Nabaprakash Sahu; Namratha Lakshmi; N S Azhagarasan; Yoshaskam Agnihotri; Manoj Rajan; Ramasubramanian Hariharan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-01-12

2.  The selection criteria of temporary or permanent luting agents in implant-supported prostheses: in vitro study.

Authors:  Angel Alvarez-Arenal; Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector deLlanos-Lanchares; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Joseba Ellacuria-Echebarria
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Retentiveness of implant-supported metal copings using different luting agents.

Authors:  Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Omid Savabi; Maziar Ebrahimi; Ghazal Savabi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-01

4.  Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant Crowns under Fatigue Loads: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  R Ajay; K Suma; Seyed Asharaf Ali; Jambai Sampath Kumar Sivakumar; V Rakshagan; V Devaki; K Divya
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

5.  Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments.

Authors:  Sina Safari; Fereshteh Hosseini Ghavam; Parviz Amini; Kaveh Yaghmaei
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  A Special Design to Facilitate Retrieval of Cement-Retained Zirconia-Based Implant-Supported Restorations.

Authors:  Mitra Farzin; Reza Derafshi; Rashin Giti; Masumeh Taghva
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2021-06

7.  Retention of different temporary cements tested on zirconia crowns and titanium abutments in vitro.

Authors:  Felix Dähne; Heike Meißner; Klaus Böning; Christin Arnold; Ralf Gutwald; Elisabeth Prause
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-20

8.  Effects of crown retrieval on implants and the surrounding bone: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Serhat Emre Ozkir; Server Mutluay Unal; Emel Yurekli; Sedat Güven
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Retention Strength after Compressive Cyclic Loading of Five Luting Agents Used in Implant-Supported Prostheses.

Authors:  Angel Alvarez-Arenal; Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector deLlanos-Lanchares; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Javier Pinés-Hueso; Joseba Ellakuria-Echebarria
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Effect of surface treatments on the retention of implant-supported cement-retained bridge with short abutments: An in vitro comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Monica Shrivastav
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.