Literature DB >> 17929326

The impact of manual processing on the expansion and directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Farlan S Veraitch1, Rosario Scott, Ju-Wei Wong, Gary J Lye, Chris Mason.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells (ESC) have the developmental potential to form every adult cell type, even after prolonged culture. Reproducibly culturing pluripotent populations and directing differentiation has proven technically challenging yet will underpin the provision of stem cells for both screening and therapeutic applications. This study investigated whether the variations inherent in manual handling procedures cause inconsistent proliferation and phenotypic variability. Two mouse ESC green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter cells lines, Oct4-GiP and 46C, were used to assess Oct4 expression during expansion and Sox1 expression during directed neuroectoderm differentiation. High inoculation cell densities (ICD) had a negative impact on Oct4-GFP expression. Similarly, increasing ICD caused a drop in Sox1-GFP expression in differentiating cultures. The expansion process had an optimum ICD of 31,800 cells cm(-2) whilst the highest yield of Sox1-GFP positive cells were found at an ICD of 16,400 cells cm(-2). These results implicate variable cell density as a major cause of interindividual variability. Passaging exposes cells to dynamic and repeated changes in their micro-environment. This was associated with a rapid drop in temperature and rise in pH. Extended exposure of 1, 2 and 3 h to ambient conditions resulted in the inhibition of ESC proliferation and Oct4-GFP expression. Dissociation subjects cells to fluid flow and centrifugal forces. Repeated exposure to fluid flow in capillaries prior to cultivation reduced the proliferative capacity of undifferentiated ESCs and caused a significant drop in differentiated neuroectoderm yield. Excessive centrifugal forces up to 1,000g caused shifts in phenotype and proliferation during expansion and differentiation. These studies highlight the need for automated cultivation systems which reproducibly control cell density, fluid flow, centrifugal forces, pH and temperature for the dissociation and inoculation of ESC processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17929326     DOI: 10.1002/bit.21673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  20 in total

1.  Cell sheet integrity and nanomechanical breakdown during programmed cell death.

Authors:  Jiashan Wang; Andrew E Pelling
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Advances in stem cell biology - an ASGBI International Conference held at Durham University.

Authors:  Stefan Przyborski
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Engineering efficient retinal pigment epithelium differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Amelia Lane; Lissa Rachel Philip; Ludmila Ruban; Kate Fynes; Matthew Smart; Amanda Carr; Chris Mason; Pete Coffey
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  Expression of an exogenous human Oct-4 promoter identifies tumor-initiating cells in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Padraic P Levings; Sean V McGarry; Thomas P Currie; David M Nickerson; Steven McClellan; Steven C Ghivizzani; Dennis A Steindler; C Parker Gibbs
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Bioprocess forces and their impact on cell behavior: implications for bone regeneration therapy.

Authors:  David Brindley; Kishaani Moorthy; Jae-Ho Lee; Chris Mason; Hae-Won Kim; Ivan Wall
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.813

6.  A novel isolator-based system promotes viability of human embryos during laboratory processing.

Authors:  Louise Hyslop; Nilendran Prathalingam; Lynne Nowak; Jeanette Fenwick; Steve Harbottle; Samantha Byerley; John Rhodes; Bruce Watson; Robin Henderson; Alison Murdoch; Mary Herbert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An engineered approach to stem cell culture: automating the decision process for real-time adaptive subculture of stem cells.

Authors:  Dai Fei Elmer Ker; Lee E Weiss; Silvina N Junkers; Mei Chen; Zhaozheng Yin; Michael F Sandbothe; Seung-il Huh; Sungeun Eom; Ryoma Bise; Elvira Osuna-Highley; Takeo Kanade; Phil G Campbell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  To clone or not to clone? Induced pluripotent stem cells can be generated in bulk culture.

Authors:  Charlotte A Willmann; Hatim Hemeda; Lisa A Pieper; Michael Lenz; Jie Qin; Sylvia Joussen; Stephanie Sontag; Paul Wanek; Bernd Denecke; Herdit M Schüler; Martin Zenke; Wolfgang Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Microfabricated modular scale-down device for regenerative medicine process development.

Authors:  Marcel Reichen; Rhys J Macown; Nicolas Jaccard; Alexandre Super; Ludmila Ruban; Lewis D Griffin; Farlan S Veraitch; Nicolas Szita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Establishment of automated culture system for murine induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Koike; Koji Kubota; Keisuke Sekine; Takanori Takebe; Rie Ouchi; Yun-Wen Zheng; Yasuharu Ueno; Naoki Tanigawa; Hideki Taniguchi
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.