BACKGROUND: Providers are increasingly being held accountable for the quality of care provided. While quality indicators have been used to benchmark the quality of care for a number of other disease states, no such measures are available for evaluating the quality of care provided to adults with epilepsy. In order to assess and improve quality of care, it is critical to develop valid quality indicators. Our objective is to describe the development of quality indicators for evaluating care of adults with epilepsy. As most care is provided in primary and general neurology care, we focused our assessment of quality on care within primary care and general neurology clinics. METHODS: We reviewed existing national clinical guidelines and systematic reviews of the literature to develop an initial list of quality indicators; supplemented the list with indicators derived from patient focus groups; and convened a 10-member expert panel to rate the appropriateness, reliability, and necessity of each quality indicator. RESULTS: From the original 37 evidence-based and 10 patient-based quality indicators, the panel identified 24 evidence-based and 5 patient-based indicators as appropriate indicators of quality. Of these, the panel identified 9 that were not necessary for high quality care. CONCLUSION: There is, at best, a poor understanding of the quality of care provided for adults with epilepsy. These indicators, developed based on published evidence, expert opinion, and patient perceptions, provide a basis to assess and improve the quality of care for this population.
BACKGROUND: Providers are increasingly being held accountable for the quality of care provided. While quality indicators have been used to benchmark the quality of care for a number of other disease states, no such measures are available for evaluating the quality of care provided to adults with epilepsy. In order to assess and improve quality of care, it is critical to develop valid quality indicators. Our objective is to describe the development of quality indicators for evaluating care of adults with epilepsy. As most care is provided in primary and general neurology care, we focused our assessment of quality on care within primary care and general neurology clinics. METHODS: We reviewed existing national clinical guidelines and systematic reviews of the literature to develop an initial list of quality indicators; supplemented the list with indicators derived from patient focus groups; and convened a 10-member expert panel to rate the appropriateness, reliability, and necessity of each quality indicator. RESULTS: From the original 37 evidence-based and 10 patient-based quality indicators, the panel identified 24 evidence-based and 5 patient-based indicators as appropriate indicators of quality. Of these, the panel identified 9 that were not necessary for high quality care. CONCLUSION: There is, at best, a poor understanding of the quality of care provided for adults with epilepsy. These indicators, developed based on published evidence, expert opinion, and patient perceptions, provide a basis to assess and improve the quality of care for this population.
Authors: Adolfo Peña; Sandeep S Virk; Richard M Shewchuk; Jeroan J Allison; O Dale Williams; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Maria Pisu; Joshua Richman; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Ellen Funkhouser; Chen Dai; Lucia Juarez; Edward Faught; Roy C Martin Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Roy C Martin; Edward Faught; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Joshua Richman; Ellen Funkhouser; Kendra Piper; Lucia Juarez; Chen Dai; Maria Pisu Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Jerzy P Szaflarski; Roy C Martin; Edward Faught; Ellen Funkhouser; Joshua Richman; Kendra Piper; Lucia Juarez; Chen Dai; Maria Pisu Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Maria Pisu; Joshua Richman; Kendra Piper; Roy Martin; Ellen Funkhouser; Chen Dai; Lucia Juarez; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Edward Faught Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Eric M Cheng; Carolyn J Crandall; Christopher T Bever; Barbara Giesser; Jodie K Haselkorn; Ron D Hays; Paul Shekelle; Barbara G Vickrey Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Edward Faught; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Joshua Richman; Ellen Funkhouser; Roy C Martin; Kendra Piper; Chen Dai; Lucia Juarez; Maria Pisu Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Mary Jo Pugh; Dan R Berlowitz; Jaya K Rao; Gabriel Shapiro; Ruzan Avetisyan; Amresh Hanchate; Kelli Jarrett; Jeffrey Tabares; Lewis E Kazis Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-01-03 Impact factor: 2.655