Literature DB >> 17928564

Adaptation and information transmission in fly motion detection.

Moshe N Safran1, Virginia L Flanagin, Alexander Borst, Haim Sompolinsky.   

Abstract

In this work, we studied the adaptation of H1, a motion-sensitive neuron in the fly visual system, to the variance of randomly fluctuating velocity stimuli. We ask two questions. 1) Which components of the motion detection system undergo genuine adaptational changes in response to the variance of the fluctuating velocity signal? 2) What are the consequences of this adaptation for the information processing capabilities of the neuron? To address these questions, we characterized the adaptation of H1 by estimating the changes in the parameters of an associated Reichardt motion detection model under various stimulus conditions. The strongest stimulus dependence was exhibited by the temporal kernel of the motion detector and was parametrized by changes in the model's high-pass time constant (tau(H)). This time constant shortened considerably with increasing velocity fluctuations. We showed that this adaptive process contributes significantly to the shortening of the velocity response time-course but not to velocity gain control. To assess the contribution of time-constant adaptation to information transmission, we compared the information rates generated by our adaptive model motion detector with model simulations in which tau(H) was held fixed at its unadapted value for all stimulus conditions. We found that for intermediate stimulus conditions, fixing tau(H) at its unadapted value led to higher information rates, suggesting that time-constant adaptation does not optimize total information rates about velocity trajectories. We also found that, over the wide range of stimulus conditions tested here, H1 information rates are dependent on the amplitude of velocity fluctuations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17928564     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00440.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  5 in total

1.  Adaptation accentuates responses of fly motion-sensitive visual neurons to sudden stimulus changes.

Authors:  Rafael Kurtz; Martin Egelhaaf; Hanno Gerd Meyer; Roland Kern
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The many facets of adaptation in fly visual motion processing.

Authors:  Rafael Kurtz
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009

3.  The motion after-effect: local and global contributions to contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Karin Nordström; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Dynamical adaptation in photoreceptors.

Authors:  Damon A Clark; Raphael Benichou; Markus Meister; Rava Azeredo da Silveira
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Efficient sensory cortical coding optimizes pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Bing Liu; Matthew V Macellaio; Leslie C Osborne
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.