Literature DB >> 17926954

64 slice MDCT generally underestimates coronary calcium scores as compared to EBT: a phantom study.

M J W Greuter1, H Dijkstra, J M Groen, R Vliegenthart, F de Lange, W K J Renema, G H de Bock, M Oudkerk.   

Abstract

The objective of our study was the determination of the influence of the sequential and spiral acquisition modes on the concordance and deviation of the calcium score on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners in comparison to electron beam tomography (EBT) as the gold standard. Our methods and materials were an anthropomorphic cardio CT phantom with different calcium inserts scanned in sequential and spiral acquisition modes on three identical 64-slice MDCT scanners of manufacturer A and on three identical 64-slice MDCT scanners of manufacturer B and on an EBT system. Every scan was repeated 30 times with and 15 times without a small random variation in the phantom position for both sequential and spiral modes. Significant differences were observed between EBT and 64-slice MDCT data for all inserts, both acquisition modes, and both manufacturers of MDCT systems. High regression coefficients (0.90-0.98) were found between the EBT and 64-slice MDCT data for both scoring methods and both systems with high correlation coefficients (R2>0.94). System A showed more significant differences between spiral and sequential mode than system B. Almost no differences were observed in scanners of the same manufacturer for the Agatston score and no differences for the Volume score. The deviations of the Agatston and Volume scores showed regression dependencies approximately equal to the square root of the absolute score. The Agatston and Volume scores obtained with 64-slice MDCT imaging are highly correlated with EBT-obtained scores but are significantly underestimated (-10% to -2%) for both sequential and spiral acquisition modes. System B is more independent of acquisition mode to calcium score than system A. The Volume score shows no intramanufacturer dependency and its use is advocated versus the Agatston score. Using the same cut points for MDCT-based calcium scores as for EBT-based calcium scores can result in classifying individuals into a too low risk category. System information and scanprotocol is therefore needed for every calcium score procedure to ensure a correct clinical interpretation of the obtained calcium score results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17926954     DOI: 10.1118/1.2750733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Small calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque simulation model: minimal size and attenuation detectable by 64-MDCT and MicroCT.

Authors:  Wisnumurti Kristanto; Peter M A van Ooijen; Jaap M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Coronary calcium mass scores measured by identical 64-slice MDCT scanners are comparable: a cardiac phantom study.

Authors:  Hildebrand Dijkstra; Marcel J W Greuter; Jaap M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart-Proença; Klaasjan W K Renema; Frank de Lange; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Assessment of coronary artery calcium by using volumetric 320-row multi-detector computed tomography: comparison of 0.5 mm with 3.0 mm slice reconstructions.

Authors:  Noortje van der Bijl; Paul W de Bruin; Jacob Geleijns; Jeroen J Bax; Joanne D Schuijf; Albert de Roos; Lucia J M Kroft
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.